TECHNET Archives

June 2009

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE)
Date:
Thu, 4 Jun 2009 08:00:08 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (152 lines)
Guidelines in of themselves are merely the under fill of the great belly
of knowledge that is Technet.
Dewey 

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Edward Rios
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 7:50 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] When not to underfill

Thanks Werner. Yes, your column was very helpful. Sounds like my 
question may be a bit naive and that I am trying to simplify things too 
much. I was searching for an IPC guideline or to at least start a 
discussion on the subject, but maybe this is a proprietary area.  Fellow

TechNetters: is that the case?

Have a great day,

Ed

Werner Engelmaier /* wrote:
>  Hi Ed,
> Underfill makes solder attachments sufficiently reliable in cases
where without it solder joint failures would occur prematurely for the
application in question. As work by Motorola [see my reliability column
Engelmaier, W., "Reliability Improvement with Underfill," Global SMT &
Packaging, Vol. 6, No. 3, March 2006, pp. 66-67] has shown, not all
underfills are of equal benefit and that increases of up to 6x are
achievable in praxis. 
> If the reliability without the underfill is sufficient-because of
small component size, high solder joint stand-off, built-in component
compliancy [Tessera patents], small CTE-mismatch, small delta-T, then
there is no need for underfills.
> Werner
>
>
>  
>
>
>  
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Edward Rios <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Sent: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 5:45 pm
> Subject: [TN] When not to underfill
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi TechNet, 
>  
>
> OK I'll admit it, I'm fairly new to the field of solder joint 
> reliability. ;)  Therefore, the recent thread about underfill
inspection 
> criteria prompted me to do additional reading on the subject. It seems

> like there is consensus on the positive effect of underfilling on BGA 
> solder joint reliability. On the other hand, are there cases where 
> underfill doesn't have a significant impact? Maybe in smaller BGA 
> components? 
>  
>
> Thanks, 
>  
>
> Ed Rios 
>  
>
> --------------------------------------------------- 
>
> Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 
>
> To unsubscri
> be, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in 
>
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet 
>
> To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) 
>
> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest 
>
> Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives 
>
> Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815 
>
> ----------------------------------------------------- 
>
>
>
>  
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>   

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2