TECHNET Archives

June 2009

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Simon Huetter <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Simon Huetter <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 25 Jun 2009 10:47:25 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (85 lines)
 <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Jun 2009 08:47:25.0495 (UTC) FILETIME=[9020D470:01C9F571]
X-NAI-Spam-Level: *
X-NAI-Spam-Score: 1
X-NAI-Spam-Report: 2 Rules triggered
	*  1 -- BAD_EMAIL_ADDRESS -- BODY: Contains a suspect email address
	*  0 -- RV3304 -- BODY: Version number


Genny=2C

I agree with Dorothy=2C refresh the immersion tin surface.
It's no problem to do so=2C simply send it to a PCB shop for
Sn refresh.

Simon

----------------------------------------
> Date: Wed=2C 24 Jun 2009 10:10:19 -0700
> From: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [TN] Immersion Tin solderability eval
> To: [log in to unmask]
>
> Genny=2C
>
> I have customers that when their immersion tin PCB has sat so many
> months on the shelf no matter how well it is stored it is sent back to
> the PCB maker to be re-tinned/plated. It takes only one pad to ruin your
> day. The smaller the pad the more likely a problem.
>
> Dorothy Lush
> Fine Pitch a Flextronics Company
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Whittaker=2C Dewey
> (EHCOE)
> Sent: Wednesday=2C June 24=2C 2009 9:43 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [TN] Immersion Tin solderability eval
>
> Genny=2C
> You have to go with the flow. Sometimes localized hand soldering will
> give you a false positive. If you want to know whether to use them or
> not=2C sacrifice a few and run them though all the subsequent processes
> (especially thermal excursions) they would be exposed to in order to
> establish an expected level of success. If you have to have an official
> reason=3B test them per IPC J-STD-003 for solderability.
> Dewey
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Genny Gibbard
> Sent: Wednesday=2C June 24=2C 2009 9:16 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [TN] Immersion Tin solderability eval
>
> We have some Immersion Tin boards that are several years old. From
> everything I have read here or elsewhere=2C ImmSn is supposed to have a
> short shelf life. 6 mos to a year. No one wants to scrap the boards
> without testing them=2C though.
> How would you verify whether they are still good? We hand-soldered some
> pads and actually had no problems which surprised me=2C considering the
> age of the boards=2C but I don't know if that is a valid test.
>
> Genny


_________________________________________________________________
Sommerferien mit vielen Digitalfotos geplant? Hier weitere Infos zur einfac=
hen Foto-Bearbeitung und -Verwaltung!
http://www.microsoft.com/switzerland/windows/de/windowslive/products/photo-=
gallery.aspx=

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2