TECHNET Archives

June 2009

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Sylvain Kaufmann <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Sylvain Kaufmann <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 22 Jun 2009 11:57:43 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (295 lines)
Dear Werner and all,
As a reader of this forum, I would be very happy to discuss this topic with you. However, I don't have much more informations than you as I am not involved in supraconducting interconnections. I had access to the same reports as you and can only guess what could be the possible causes of the incident.
 
And, as you may imagine, I am not an official/authorised spoke person from the CERN, so I could never discuss things that are not public and will never talk in the name of the organisation.
 
Sorry not to have sharper informations
Best regards
sylvain


________________________________

From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: vendredi, 19. juin 2009 19:09
To: [log in to unmask]; Sylvain Kaufmann
Subject: Re: [TN] LGA assembly question


Hi Sylvain,
Could you give us the details about the solder joint failure that shut down the accelerator. There are all kinds of rumors floating around and it would be nice to have the facts.

Regards,
Werner Engelmaier
Engelmaier Associates, L.C.
Electronic Packaging, Interconnection and Reliability Consulting
7 Jasmine Run
Ormond Beach, FL 32174 USA
Phone: 386-437-8747, Cell: 386-316-5904
E-mail: [log in to unmask], Website: www.engelmaier.com




-----Original Message-----
From: Sylvain Kaufmann <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Fri, Jun 19, 2009 9:49 am
Subject: [TN] LGA assembly question


Ioan,

Merci pour le retour.



One question more if I may: did you set a different placement force as you would 

have used for a BGA for example, or did "regular" setting work well?



Bev, sorry I answered your question personnaly, I sent my reply too quickly. To 

sumarize for others, in my mind QFN are packages with a ground/thermal plane in 

middle and signals connection in periphery. And LGA is like a BGA but with 

square pads and no balls.



I am concerned about shorts because this device is a DC/DC tha
t can drive up to 

12 amps and I would not see these assemblies burn because of assembly issues.



Thank you again

Regards

sylvain







-----Original Message-----

From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> ] On Behalf Of Ioan Tempea

Sent: vendredi, 19. juin 2009 15:16

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: [TN] LGA assembly question



Bonjour Sylvain,



I have recently done several boards with the exacly same components, in almost 

the same conditions as yours. I had ENIG/Pick'n'place/lead-free SAC305. The only 

difference was I did convection reflow.



They print well, they solder well. I would not dread shorts, this package is 

more lenient than QFNs. The only 2 special things I have observed were:

- The thermal demand is higher than for regular BGAs. I had metal top BGAs on 

the same board, still the LGAs were 10 deg C colder. In order to bring the LGAs 

at 240deg C I had to bump the BGAs up to 250 deg C.

- Hard to control voiding



Since I am not familiar with vapour phase, maybe the above will not be an issue 

for you.



Regards,



Ioan Tempea, ing.

t : 450-967-7100 ext : 244

[log in to unmask]

www.digico.cc

P N'imprimer que si nécessaire - Print only if you must -----Message 

d'origine----- De : Sylvain Kaufmann [mailto:[log in to unmask] <mailto:Sylvain.Kaufmann@ CERN.CH?> ] Envoyé : 

19 juin 2009 09:06 À : [log in to unmask] Objet : [TN] LGA assembly question



Dear Technetters,

Our assembly workshop has to assemble 4 prototype boards where LGA packages with 

133 connections are used. I allready worked with BGAs or QFNs but never with LGA 

packages and I am concerned about shorts/open that could occur.



Provided that I cannot run tests and conditions are as followed:

- ENIG surface finish boards

- Vapor phase reflow soldering

- Pick and Place machine

- Leadfree or lead containing solder can be used



Would some of you be kind enough to share experiences/advices so that we would 

have little chances to successfuly assemble these boards?



Thank you in advance for your help.



S. Kaufmann



************************************************************

Sylvain Kaufmann

CERN / European laboratory for particle physics Site de Meyrin

1211 Geneva 23

Switzerland

Dpt: EN-ICE-DEM (int mail J06600)

Phone: +41 22 767 37 02

Fax: +41 22 766 87 77

E-mail: [log in to unmask]

Web: www.cern.ch

http://cern.ch/dem

************************************************************



---------------------------------------------------

Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To 

unsubscribe, send a message
 to [log in to unmask] with following text in the BODY 

(NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or (re-start) 

delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or 

(MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to 

[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the archives of previous posts at: 

http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 

for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 

847-615-7100 ext.2815

-----------------------------------------------------



---------------------------------------------------

Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To 

unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the BODY 

(NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or (re-start) 

delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or 

(MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to 

[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the archives of previous posts at: 

http
://listserv.ipc.org/archives <http://listserv.ipc.org/archives>  Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 

for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 

847-615-7100 ext.2815

-----------------------------------------------------



---------------------------------------------------

Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0

To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in

the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet

To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to 

[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)

To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to 

[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest

Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives

Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for 

additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 

847-615-7100 ext.2815

-----------------------------------------------------



---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2