Bob,
I will add the caveat that for GENERAL INSPECTION this is indeed only for
devices not under RF shields or are under fence and lid cans. Hmm, that
doesn't read well, let me try again.
For general inspection of all circuit packs coming down a production line,
apply only the portions of this document that can be performed visually to
underfilled, uncovered CSPs and BGAs or those same types of components under
fence and lid RF shields. The visual inspection rules do not apply to CSPs
and BGAs for general production under single piece RF cans. This would
require destruction of all product.
However, all the rules apply for process development/product qualification
where one is willing to sacrifice finished circuit packs to gain knowledge
of the acceptability of the overall quality.
The response to your pin hole comment will have to come from my Class 3
friend. I'm class 2 and this is not in my bailiwick.
No, I do not want to add encroachment of underfill onto other components as
a general fail criterion! I don't think you understand how little space
handset manufacturers have around individual components and how friggen hard
it is to do this (Underfilling) when designers get their shorts in a knot
over how many holes you put in their cans, even when the theory says they
are way too conservative (Sorry for the rant.) I would prefer that each
company deal with that in their spec. Now obviously if this ever becomes
more than a TechNet exercise and is going to go into an official IPC doc,
you can gather votes and vote my stance into oblivion. :)
" OR OTHER MOUNTED OR MECHANICAL DEVICES THAT WOULD INTERFERE WITH THE
ASSEMBLY." Is a great addition. It will be in the next update.
Bev
RIM
-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of bob wettermann
Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 5:54 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Underfill Workmanship Pass/fail Criteria Proposal-comments
from proto/rework
All:
Our staff comments in CAPS.
Regards
Bob Wettermann
Workmanship Standards for BGA and CSP Underfills
GENERAL COMMENT. IN MANY CASES THE DEVICES WHICH ARE UNDERFILLED ARE PLACED
UNDERNEATH RF SIELDS THEREFORE THEIR INPSECTION THROUGH VISUAL MEANS IS
IMPOSSIBLE WITHOUT EXPENSIVE TOOLS. THERE SHOULD BE A CAVEAT TO THIS
INSPECTION CRITERIA WHERE ONLY IF THE COMPONENT CAN BE VISUALLY INSPECTED
(IE 2-PIECE OR WINDOW SHIELD, DEVICES NOT UNDER SHIELDS) SHOULD THESE
INSPECTION CRITERIA APPLY. THIS WILL ALLOW THE SPECIFICATION TO BE APLIED TO
ALL FIRMS LARGE AND SMALL. (SEE PREVIOUSLY PROPOSED LAMINOGRAPHIC XRAY
INSPECTION CRITERIA WHICH WERE VOTED DOWN IN REV D)
Target - Class 1,2,3
* Component requiring under fill completely underfilled with a good
fillet all the way around, the fillet just approaching the maximum component
body height, completely cured, no encroachment onto other components and no
voiding whatsoever
THIS WILL CAUSE A BURDEN ON SMALLER FIRMS AS ACCOUSTIC IMAGING IS CAPITAL
INTENSIVE
Acceptable - Class 3
* At least 50% fillet height up the side of the component body
* Small pin holes and voids are permissible provided they do not exceed
5% of fillet surface area and have a maximum diameter of 0.5 mm (0.020
inches).
HOW WILL THIS BE PRACTICALLY MEASURED……MOST SMALLER AND EVEN MEDIUM CM’S DO
NOT HAVE THIS CAPABILITY
Acceptable - Class 1,2
* Component requiring underfill underfilled such that all balls are
covered, but no evidence of an exterior fillet, no encroachment onto other
components and no voiding whatsoever
* Component requiring underfill underfilled such that all balls are
covered, with or without an exterior fillet, no encroachment onto other
components and only small voids, not touching any solder joints
* Component requiring underfill underfilled such that all balls are
covered, with or without an exterior fillet, no encroachment onto other
components and even large voiding, but not touching any solder joints
* A void or voids less than or equal to 50% around the perimeter of one
or more solder joints
Defect - Class 1,2,3
* Underfill completely missing from components where it is required
* Underfill not completely covering all the peripheral solder joints
* Voiding such that a void traverses the distance between two or more
solder joints under the array device requiring underfill
* A void or voids more than 50% around the perimeter of one or more
solder joints
* Material extending on to the top of the BGA or CSP
* Uncured material
ADD: UNDERFILL MATERIAL EXTENDING ONTO OTHER DEVICES
Special Conditions - Class 1,2
* Encroachment onto other components, but meeting all other criteria
above for target or acceptable conditions will be dealt with as a pass/fail
on a case-by-case basis
* Underfill interfering with proper placement of heatsink OR OTHER
MOUNTED OR MECHANICAL DEVICES THAT WOULD INTERFERE WITH THE ASSEMBLY.
* There should be no evidence of underfill flowing out through holes
under the device.
* After curing there should be no visual evidence of cracks between
the device surface, underfill or board.
* There should be no evidence of damage to the board or device caused
by contact with the dispensing needle or height sensor.
* Underfill filler shows evidence of separation
Bob Wettermann
PH 847-767-5745
--- On Fri, 6/5/09, Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
From: Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: [TN] Underfill Workmanship Pass/fail Criteria Proposal
To: [log in to unmask]
Date: Friday, June 5, 2009, 4:45 PM
Osmosis is a potentially correct technical answer.
Oz Moses is a reference to Bev's out of this world bewilderment of the
following (I know it would be more appropriate in a tabular format):
* Syed's ability to pull water out (parting of Red Sea)
* Why a Canadian was no longer in Kansas
* The strange movie parallels of the Wizard of Oz and the Ten
Commandments
* That a yellow brick road lead to the only place that had no
water or oil
Dewey
-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Inge
Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 2:13 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Underfill Workmanship Pass/fail Criteria Proposal
Never heard of Oz Moses
Inge
----- Original Message -----
From: "Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE)" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 10:47 PM
Subject: Re: [TN] Underfill Workmanship Pass/fail Criteria Proposal
Ozmosis.
Dewey
-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Bev Christian
Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 12:24 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Underfill Workmanship Pass/fail Criteria Proposal
Syed,
How in the world are you going to get water in fully enclosed voids
underneath a component?
Bev
-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Syed Ahmad
Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 3:05 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Underfill Workmanship Pass/fail Criteria Proposal
So, if water gathers in the voids and the part powers up to above 100
degC,
the boiling water does not do anything to the system?
-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Bev Christian
Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 1:14 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Underfill Workmanship Pass/fail Criteria Proposal
Chris,
To your last point, if the internal structure of the underfill is like
Swiss cheese but the voids don't touch a solder joint, why should I
care?
Your first point, is an excellent one. I guess it comes down to whether
this becomes a part of 610 (essentially visual only) or gets added into
a larger underfill doc of Brian Toleno's committee or is a stand-alone
doc. If one of the latter two, then we can include things that are not
strictly visual only.
Bev
RIM
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Mahanna [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 1:54 PM
To: TechNet E-Mail Forum; Bev Christian
Subject: RE: Re: [TN] Underfill Workmanship Pass/fail Criteria Proposal
Hey Bev,
Good stuff. I'll post my concerns and see if anybody bites. As with
many J-STD-001/610 requirements, one has to be careful about defining
attributes that we are optically blind to. The problem (as I see it,
ha) is that nondestructive inspection techniques like x-ray and
acoustics typically provide far less resolution and contrast than what
we have in our mind's eye. Therefore the discrimination between
acceptable and not becomes a different animal.
So, I'm wondering if anyone has information about the uncertainty of
measuring artifacts like the ones below?
You want test- I do test, but I'm always worried about indeterminable
conformance.
*void 50% around the perimeter of one or more solder joints
*void traverses the distance between two or more solder joints under the
array device
Also, how about simple area percentage criteria after taring-out the
balls?
Chris
Chris Mahanna
Robisan Laboratory Inc.
-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Bev Christian
Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 11:52 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Underfill Workmanship Pass/fail Criteria Proposal
Bob and other TechNetters,
I have taken what has been said and added, especially from Bob's work,
more failure criteria for all classes of products. Here they are:
* Underfill interfering with proper placement of heatsink
* There should be no evidence of underfill flowing out through
holes under the device.
* After curing there should be no visual evidence of cracks
between the device surface, underfill or board.
* There should be no evidence of damage to the board or device
caused by contact with the dispensing needle or height sensor.
* Underfill filler shows evidence of separation
I have still no definitive statements about small amounts of underfill
on an upper horizontal surface of a component (Graham Collin's issue).
Note I did not necessarily mean the top of the component. And the second
one is underfill on surrounding components. Remember us handset people
have NO SPACE. Forget about keep-out zones for needle maneuver!
Further comments?
Bev
-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Willis [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 2:54 AM
To: 'TechNet E-Mail Forum'; Bev Christian
Subject: RE: [TN] Underfill Workmanship Pass/fail Criteria Proposal
Bev I am very sorry but I did not send my old text as I agreed after my
trip, I just could not find it as it dated back to May 2001. I never
sorted out the images for the flip chip and uBGA from my libarary for
the posters/wall charts.
The draft text is below which I actually found on line at SMTNet Forum
with three comments see link:
http://www.smtnet.com//forums/index.cfm?fuseaction=view_thread&CFApp=1&T
hrea
d_ID=1600&#Message6706
Here is a draft visual inspection guide for underfill, please pass this
on to the relevant people for any comments or suggestions. I am
currently working on the pictures to go with the reference guide.
Flip Chip/uBGA Underfill Visual Standards
The aim of this document is to produce some draft text and then select
photographs to make up a draft visual standard for inspection. There is
also a need to produce some reference material for C Scan images.
The following images provide a guide to the inspection requirement after
the underfilling operation. They may also be applied after curing of the
underfill.
CLASSIFICATION OF QUALITY STANDARDS
During the assessment the following classifications, which are
pictorially illustrated, should apply:
SATISFACTORY
This is a satisfactory condition which should be achieved and used as
the standard for manufacture.
ACCEPTABLE
This condition represents the maximum acceptable departure from the
"Satisfactory" condition. Examples within this limit of deviation will
not require reworking. Individual clarification accompanies each example
illustration. Consideration should be given to modification to the
process materials or conditions.
UNACCEPTABLE
This applies to an unacceptable condition which should not be reworked
without the cause of the fault being established. Rework may be possible
after assessment of the fault and corrective action taken on the
process.
Flip Chip/uBGA Underfill Visual Standards
Satisfactory
The underfill should be visible at the edge of the device and extend
completely around the perimeter.
Satisfactory
The underfill should be visible on all four sides, there may be evidence
of more material on one or two sides to aid complete filling of device
base.
Satisfactory
The underfill if by design should be visible on the side of the device
and reach a minimum height of 25% of the thickness of the package.
Satisfactory
The base of the device should be completely filled with no evidence of
voids in the underfill or solder joints being visible around the
perimeter of the device.
Satisfactory
Curing of the underfill material should be compared with the reference
colour standards. Evidence of colour change illustrates a correctly
cured sample.
Acceptable
Flow out of underfill from the device is acceptable provided that it
does not completely cover any solder joints. Flow out on to test points,
through holes is unacceptable and needs to be reworked and the process
modified.
Acceptable
Small bubbles in the surface of the underfill fillet is acceptable
provided that no solder joint is visible.
Acceptable
Evidence of a needle dispense pattern around the device is acceptable,
the width of the pattern should be kept to a minimum.
Acceptable
The underfill if by design should be visible on the side of the device
and reach a height of no less than 20% of the thickness of the package
in the centre of any side.
Acceptable
Underfill fillets which are not visible on the side of the device are
not rejectable, however modifications to the dispense process should be
made
Unacceptable
There is no evidence of underfill on the top side of the device
Unacceptable
Curing of the underfill should be compared with the reference colour
standards. No evidence of colour change is unacceptable.
Unacceptable
The underfill is not visible along the complete side of any device
Unacceptable
Solder joints are visible without underfill on the side of the device
Unacceptable
There should be no evidence of underfill flowing out through holes under
the device.
Unacceptable
After curing there should be no visual evidence of cracks between the
device surface, underfill or board.
Unacceptable
There should be no evidence of damage to the board or device caused by
contact with the dispensing needle or height sensor.
When using CSAM to asses the underfilling/curing process the following
criteria may apply:
Satisfactory
Underfill is complete and there is no evidence of voiding between the
device and the board.
Acceptable
Underfill is complete and there is evidence of small voids of less than
50% of the solder bump diameter. There is no evidence of voids around
solder joints.
Unacceptable
After curing there should be no evidence of cracks between the device
surface, underfill or board.
Unacceptable
Underfill is incomplete and there is evidence of voids around or between
the solder joints
Unacceptable
Underfill is complete but there is evidence of voids which are larger
than 50% of the solder bump
Unacceptable
Underfill filler shows evidence of separation or uneven flow and will
expansion matching and affect the long-term reliability.
Draft Produced by Bob Willis
28/5/2001 Issue 4.
Bob Willis
2 Fourth Ave, Chelmsford, Essex, CM1 4HA England
Tel: (44) 1245 351502
Fax: (44) 1245 496123
Mobile: 07860 775858
www.ASKbobwillis.com
www.SolderingStandards.com
PCB Design for Manufacture & Assembly Workshop 15th October
www.ASKbobwillis.com PCB Inspection & Quality Control Workshop 3rd
November www.ASKbobwillis.com/faworkshops.pdf
Book Bob's "Step by Step Failure Analysis Workshop" 4th November
www.ASKbobwillis.com/faworkshops.pdf
-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Bev Christian
Sent: 04 June 2009 21:45
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Underfill Workmanship Pass/fail Criteria Proposal
Bob,
This is weird. You are the second TechNetter to ask for the draft
document, which I posted on TechNet this morning at 11:07 AM EDST. Here
it is again.
Bev
RIM
Workmanship Standards for BGA and CSP Underfills
Target - Class 1,2,3
* Component requiring underfill completely underfilled with a good
fillet all the way around, the fillet just approaching the maximum
component body height, completely cured, no encroachment onto other
components and no voiding whatsoever
Acceptable - Class 3
* At least 50% fillet height up the side of the component body
* Small pin holes and voids are permissible provided they do not
exceed 5% of fillet surface area and have a maximum diameter of 0.5 mm
(0.020 inches).
Acceptable - Class 1,2
* Component requiring underfill underfilled such that all balls
are
covered, but no evidence of an exterior fillet, no encroachment onto
other components and no voiding whatsoever
* Component requiring underfill underfilled such that all balls
are
covered, with or without an exterior fillet, no encroachment onto other
components and only small voids, not touching any solder joints
* Component requiring underfill underfilled such that all balls
are
covered, with or without an exterior fillet, no encroachment onto other
components and even large voiding, but not touching any solder joints
* A void or voids less than or equal to 50% around the perimeter
of
one or more solder joints
Defect - Class 1,2,3
* Underfill completely missing from components where it is
required
* Underfill not completely covering all the peripheral solder
joints
* Voiding such that a void traverses the distance between two or
more
solder joints under the array device requiring underfill
* A void or voids more than 50% around the perimeter of one or
more
solder joints
* Material extending on to the top of the BGA or CSP
* Uncured material
Special Conditions - Class 1,2
* Encroachment onto other components, but meeting all other
criteria
above for target or acceptable conditions will be dealt with as a
pass/fail on a case-by-case basis
-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of bob wettermann
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 4:42 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Underfill Workmanship Pass/fail Criteria Proposal
Dear Richard:
Pls send the proposal on to us. We perform underfill rework and this
issue presents itslf fairly frequently.
Thanks
Bob Wettermann
[log in to unmask]
Bob Wettermann
PH 847-767-5745
--- On Thu, 6/4/09, Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
From: Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: [TN] Underfill Workmanship Pass/fail Criteria Proposal
To: [log in to unmask]
Date: Thursday, June 4, 2009, 1:10 PM
I reviewed the proposed items for the standard and I think it looks
great. I have sent it to several other people directly involved in BGA,
CSP, and flipchip underfill at various companies in Minnesota for their
review and will pass on their comments as well.
Thank you for doing all of this work.
-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Bev Christian
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 11:43 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Underfill Workmanship Pass/fail Criteria Proposal
The doc we are discussing is only for CSPs and BGAs. I did not want to
try and tackle too much, especially something that:
a) I don't know about
b) Has been around a lot longer and might already have a set of
pass/fail criteria
Bev
RIM
-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David D. Hillman
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 12:40 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Underfill Workmanship Pass/fail Criteria Proposal
Hi Graham - in the words of Sir Doug, "it depends"! Under most
situations, that thin of underfill will have no influence on the solder
joint integrity. However, a specific component construction may not be
happy with any underfill on its top causing issues. The simple way to
avoid the question is to not allow underfill on the top of the BGA or
CSP. I can't
speak for a flip chip as I don't have any underfill experience in that
realm.
Dave
Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]> Sent by: TechNet
<[log in to unmask]>
06/04/2009 11:20 AM
Please respond to
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>; Please respond to
[log in to unmask]
To
[log in to unmask]
cc
Subject
Re: [TN] Underfill Workmanship Pass/fail Criteria Proposal
Absolutely. If material interferes with installing heatsinks, it's
unacceptable. But that would be true also of other methods like corner
bonding.
My question: would a thin film of underfill material, say a thou or two,
on a small section (say 15% of the top area) of a BGA have any impact to
reliability? I am not talking about having big globs of the stuff on
top (although I still wonder how that would influence reliability).
In terms of impacting reliability, I think a more important criteria
would be that the underfill be even volume on each side (so the part
would be underfilled reasonably symmetrically). Same size fillets on
opposing sides.
regards,
- Graham
-----Original Message-----
From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 1:12 PM
To: [log in to unmask]; Collins, Graham (FN) @ ESI
Subject: RE: [TN] Underfill Workmanship Pass/fail Criteria Proposal
Too much material over the top of the component many add uncalculated
thickness when installing a heat sinks.
Vic,
-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Graham Collins
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 11:01 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Underfill Workmanship Pass/fail Criteria Proposal
How? And to what extent?? Would a tiny bit of underfill on one corner
hurt the reliability? Are you talking about big lumps of underfill, or
a thin skin?
The underfill we use is pretty thin, runs everywhere if allowed to, and
will form a thin coating on top if it gets there.
regards,
- Graham
-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Stadem, Richard D.
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 12:41 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Underfill Workmanship Pass/fail Criteria Proposal
Yes, having some on top of the component hurts the reliability.
-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Graham Collins
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 10:27 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Underfill Workmanship Pass/fail Criteria Proposal
Hi Bev
Why would material on the component top be considered a defect? Process
indicator I can see, but does it impact reliability?
regards,
- Graham
-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Bev Christian
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 12:07 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Underfill Workmanship Pass/fail Criteria Proposal
TechNetters,
OK after speaking to a couple of industry friends, this is what we have
come up with. I will leave it to them to speak up and identify
themselves, if they wish. I have written this up in IPC-A-610 format
and have tried to cover all situations for Class 2 and 3 products in
particular.
If we can nail this, I would like to present this to the IPC as the
first IPC draft doc essentially hammered out by out TechNet community.
Comments readily accepted!
Bev
RIM
Workmanship Standards for BGA and CSP Underfills
Target - Class 1,2,3
* Component requiring underfill completely underfilled
with
a good
fillet all the way around, the fillet just approaching the maximum
component body height, completely cured, no encroachment onto other
components and no voiding whatsoever
Acceptable - Class 3
* At least 50% fillet height up the side of the component
body
* Small pin holes and voids are permissible provided they
do not
exceed 5% of fillet surface area and have a maximum diameter of 0.5 mm
(0.020 inches).
Acceptable - Class 1,2
* Component requiring underfill underfilled such that all
balls
are covered, but no evidence of an exterior fillet, no encroachment onto
other components and no voiding whatsoever
* Component requiring underfill underfilled such that all
balls
are covered, with or without an exterior fillet, no encroachment onto
other components and only small voids, not touching any solder joints
* Component requiring underfill underfilled such that all
balls
are covered, with or without an exterior fillet, no encroachment onto
other components and even large voiding, but not touching any solder
joints
* A void or voids less than or equal to 50% around the
perimeter
of one or more solder joints
Defect - Class 1,2,3
* Underfill completely missing from components where it
is
required
* Underfill not completely covering all the peripheral
solder
joints
* Voiding such that a void traverses the distance between
two or
more solder joints under the array device requiring underfill
* A void or voids more than 50% around the perimeter of
one
or
more solder joints
* Material extending on to the top of the BGA or CSP
* Uncured material
Special Conditions - Class 1,2
* Encroachment onto other components, but meeting all
other
criteria above for target or acceptable conditions will be dealt with as
a pass/fail on a case-by-case basis
---------------------------------------------------------------------
This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential
information, privileged material (including material protected by the
solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute
non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than
the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this
transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete
this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or
reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not
authorized and may be unlawful.
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing
per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing
per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing
per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing
per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing
per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask]
or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing
per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential
information, privileged material (including material protected by the
solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute
non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than
the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this
transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete
this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or
reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not
authorized and may be unlawful.
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing
per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing
per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask]
or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing
per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask]
or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential
information, privileged material (including material protected by the
solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute
non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than
the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this
transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete
this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or
reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not
authorized and may be unlawful.
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing
per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask]
or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential
information, privileged material (including material protected by the
solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute
non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than
the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this
transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete
this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or
reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not
authorized and may be unlawful.
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET
Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the
posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the
archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please
visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for
additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential
information, privileged material (including material protected by the
solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute
non-public
information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the
intended
recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in
error,
please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from
your
system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this
transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be
unlawful.
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask]
or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential
information, privileged material (including material protected by the
solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute
non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than
the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this
transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete
this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or
reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not
authorized and may be unlawful.
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask]
or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
|
