TECHNET Archives

May 2009

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Wed, 20 May 2009 08:06:09 -0300
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
Well, if I knew I was not clear on it does that make me just half dumb, or full dumb???  Dewey, cut me some slack!!!



 



Thanks Werner.



 



regards, 

 - Graham 



From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 

Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 4:29 PM

To: Collins, Graham (FN) @ ESI; [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: [TN] Underfill Pass/fail criteria



 



Hi Graham,

You are reading it incorrectly.



If you compare the results in Fig. 2 with those in Figs. 3 and 4, it is clear that snap-curing underfill give better fatigue life improvements [do not ask me why, I don't know].

Werner



 



-----Original Message-----

From: [log in to unmask]

To: [log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask]

Sent: Tue, 19 May 2009 3:17 pm

Subject: RE: [TN] Underfill Pass/fail criteria



Werner, my apologies - if I have offended it was not intended – where meaning has not been understood the fault is mine.  Well, that and plus that just as I think I’m understanding the intent of what you’ve written, someone rushes into my cube and distracts me with an inane fact.



 



The one thing I’m not clear on – you seem to be saying tha t slow curing resins give a better fatigue life, but that this doesn’t translate into real-world reliability improvement?  Or am I reading it incorrectly?



 



regards, 

 - Graham Collins



 



From: [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>  [mailto:[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> ] 

Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 4:01 PM

To: [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> ; Collins, Graham (FN) @ ESI

Subject: Re: [TN] Underfill Pass/fail criteria



 



Hi Graham,

The English language is wonderfully adapt to explain things—that is why it has displaced French as the language of diplo macy and German as the language of technology—it is now a great lingua franca.

I try [nobody is perfect, as my wife reminds me all the time], but sometimes I do not succeed in conveying the meaning properly.

What do I need to clarify, if not to say dumb down?

Werner



 



 



-----Original Message-----

From: Graham Collins <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> >

To: [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> 

Sent: Tue, 19 May 2009 2:31 pm

Subject: Re: [TN] Underfill Pass/fail criteria



For the rest of us, it's possible to get a copy of Werner's article at:







































http://www.globalsmt.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=33&Itemid=65 <http://www.globalsmt.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=33&Itemid=65> 















































































Now if only I could get him to explain it to me in small words...  :-)















































































regards,







































 - Graham Collins















































































-----Original Message-----







































From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> ] On Behalf Of Werner Engelmaier /*







































Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 3:18 PM







































To: [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> 







































Subject: Re: [TN] Underfill Pass/fail criteria























































































































 Hi Bev,







































Clearly, the most important SJs that need to be covered are the outermost rows 







































and the rows directly underneath the die outline—this later is most important 







































for face-up BGAs and CSPs.













=0

A



















I do not know if one can write generally applicable pass/fail criteria [because, 







































what else, 'It depends'].







































I ave attached a column of mine on underfills [sorry for the rest of you for 







































whom IPC strips the attachment], Engelmaier, W., “Reliability Improvement with 







































Underfill,” Global SMT & Packaging, Vol. 6, No. 3, March202006, pp. 66-67. 







































Werner























































































































 























































































































 















































































-----Original Message-----







































From: Bev Christian <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> >







































To: [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> 







































Sent: Tue, 19 May 2009 1:51 pm







































Subject: [TN] Underfill Pass/fail criteria























































































































































































































































































































































































































































TechNetters,







































I am aware of J-STd-030 "Guideline for Selection & Application of







































Underfill" and the existence of IPC standards committee 5-24F "Underfill







































Adhesives for Flip Chip Applications".  There is nothing in IPC-A-610D







































about underfills.  I have taken Brian Toleno's very good course on







































underfills, but on going back and looking at the CD, I don't see







































anything on pass/fail criteria.  Do any of you know of an international







































standard (American, IEC, Japanese) with pass/fail criteria for cured







































unde

rfills?















































































I am particularly interested in what said standard (or anything you want







































to tell me) says about coverage and voiding.















































































Bev







































RIM















































































---------------------------------------------------------------------







































This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential 







































information, privileged 







































material (including material protected by the 







































solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public 







































information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended 







































recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please 















































































immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. 







































Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by 







































unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.















































































---------------------------------------------------







































Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0







































To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>  with following text in







































the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet







































To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to 







































[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> : SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)







































To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to 







































[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> : SET Technet Digest







































Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives <http://listserv.ipc.org/archives> 







































Please visi

t IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 <http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16>  for 







































additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>  or 







































847-615-7100 ext.2815







































-----------------------------------------------------































































































































































 























































































































---------------------------------------------------







































Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0







































To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>  with following text in







































the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet







































To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to 







































[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> : SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)







































To receive ONE mailing per20day of all the posts: send e-mail to 







































[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> : SET Technet Digest







































Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives <http://listserv.ipc.org/archives> 







































Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 <http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16>  for 







































additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>  or 







































847-615-7100 ext.2815







































-----------------------------------------------------








































ATOM RSS1 RSS2