TECHNET Archives

March 2009

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 19 Mar 2009 09:58:20 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (116 lines)
PPAP - Production Part Approval Process, is used in the automotive
supply chain to establish confidence in component suppliers and their
production processes, by demonstrating that:

"....all customer engineering design record and specification
requirements are properly understood by the supplier and that the
process has the potential to produce product consistently meeting these
requirements during an actual production run at the quoted production
rate."


PSW - Part Submission Warrant, The result of the PPAP process is a
series of documents gathered in one specific location (a binder or
electronically) called the "PPAP Package". The PPAP package is a series
of documents which need a formal approval by the supplier and customer.
The form that summarizes this package is called PSW (Part Submission
Warrant). The approval of the PSW indicates that the supplier
responsible person (usually the Quality Engineer) has reviewed this
package and that the customer has not identified any issues that would
prevent its approbation.

This is from: 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Production_Part_Approval_Process

AECQ100 - Automotive Electronic Committee, Automotive quality is
governed by a set of various standards. The most frequent and recognized
one is the series of documents published by the Automotive Electronic
Committee (AEC). One of these is the AEC-Q100 which describes the tests
and conditions electronic components have to satisfy before the
automotive qualification can be pronounced. Different grades are defined
depending mainly on the operational temperature conditions.

This is from:

http://www.atmel.com/dyn/resources/prod_documents/doc7760.pdf

Steve

 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ken Bloomquist
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 9:41 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Using CEM-1 in Pb-free Wave Solder?

Hi Ted,

I'm not in the automotive industry and I'm afraid some of your acronyms
have gone over my head, i.e. PPAP, AECQ, PSW, etc. They may not be
specific to the auto industry but I don't recognize them.

Could I get a short definition?

Thanks,

KennyB

-----Original Message-----
From: Ted Tontis [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 6:50 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Using CEM-1 in Pb-free Wave Solder?

I work for a CM that has 75%-80% of the customer base as automotive. I
can tell you that the cost of changing a design is neither cheap nor
quick. 90% of the automotive assemblies we make are from customers that
assembly and sell the final product to the automotive industry. All
products must have a level 3 PPAP on the final assembly and a separate
level 3 on the bare boards. We have now reached a point that AECQ
information is required for all the components placed on the PCB and or
used on the final assembly to our end use customer. On average my full
level 3 PPAP's are 200+ pages and changes/amendments to the original
PPAP could be as short as a PSW or as large as 100+ pages. This doesn't
include what our customer or their final customer needs to do for their
final PPAP. So when something changes in the automotive industry it has
a ripple effect and everyone has to make changes or updates which
requires a lot of time and money. 
I have been working with a customer that has had a design issue where
the terminal ends do not mate correctly. We notified them over a year
ago and provided supporting documentation from the supplier of the
terminal stating that it was incorrect, they are now just starting to do
something about it.
It's not as simple a changing or fixing the problem. It's like working
on a military project. One small fuse would require a pallet of paper
work and two years, minimal, for approval on changes and by that time
the product is no longer being produced.

Ted T.


---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET
Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the
posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the
archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please
visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for
additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2