Inge,
Alas, Ich bin ein Unikum.
Werner
-----Original Message-----
From: Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>
To: TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>; [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 3:38 am
Subject: RE: {Spam?} Re: [TN] solder fatigue predictions for highly asymmetrical duty cycles
...the tricky part is getting all the necessary info, AND getting correct info.
You see what I mean? Try to solve this equation: x+y=
nothing after the equals-sign, not easy to do any calculation.
has nothing to do with age, rather lack of knowhow. That's why we need many
werners..
Inge
-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Werner Engelmaier /*
Sent: tisdag 31 mars 2009 02:01
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: {Spam?} Re: [TN] solder fatigue predictions for highly asymmetrical
duty cycles
Hi Inge,
You are going super-conservative in your old age. Heck, I have had accelerated
tests with mean cyclic lives of 100 cycles and others with no failures in
100,000 cycle---It all depends.
If you understand the load drivers and the connections to cyclic life, you can
execute a proper Design-for-Reliability in almost all cases; the tricky part is
getting all the necessary info, AND getting correct info.
Werner
-----Original Message-----
From: Inge <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 6:28 pm
Subject: Re: [TN] solder fatigue predictions for highly asymmetrical duty cycles
not an answer, but some reflections....?
?
I'm not a guru, more of a practical gnu. We have some math specialists who have
produced models and calculations that make a normal reader exhausted to go from
page 1 to page 200. After going through some reports like that, you feel rather
disoriented. So, in order to know about the failure modes and six sigma, Time to
Failure and such parameters, we decided to go the hands-on way. We 'simply'
produced a lot of cloned boards with a substantial lot of components on, and
started temp cycling with various symmetries and limits. Believe it or not, we
have passed 10,000 cycles in some cases. The result will not be known until the
end of this year. This method is not very comfortable either, making all these
hundreds of microscope inspections and measure daisy chains and other stuff.
Because our customer wants this way, we simply do it. Personally, I prefer
neither of the ways, but more of a cautious and well performed design. Follow
the derating rules, don't buy components from unknown manufacturers, hold back
when the design engineers excess in very large or very odd boards, keep to a
board producer you know, don't mix extremly hot components with mW components
and a lot more of goodies . Sounds like stopping the development of new
technology, but after reading Toyota's LEAN thinking, it seems as making many
small development steps are safer, than to make a brand new super design. In
earlier days, we had time to make prototypes, take our time and make a small
pre-series, then introduce improvements, longlife test and slowly start series
production.
Now we go directly from CAD engineering to production....?
says an old dog?
?
Inge?
?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nieznanski, John A - SSD" <[log in to unmask]>?
To: <[log in to unmask]>?
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 10:05 PM?
Subject: [TN] solder fatigue predictions for highly asymmetrical duty cycles?
?
Hello Tech-Net Gurus,?
?
The solder fatigue parameters called out in IPC-D-279, IPC-SM-785 and
IPC-9701 all assume symmetrical (i.e. 50%) duty cycles and temperature swings.
This raises the question as to how far these calculations can be pushed to
predict solder fatigue in low duty cycle, variable duty cycle or high duty cycle
applications.?
?
In particular, Tsj ( = mean cyclic solder joint temperature), and tD ( =
half-cycle dwell time in minutes) are both used and are directly affected by
duty cycle. It is simple enough to recalculate these values based on
asymmetrical duty cycles, but how do we know that the predicted solder fatigue
results are still valid? If we know, do we know what assumptions are required to
make the results valid? This seems like a fairly common situation. Has anyone
correlated measured results to predictions in this regard??
?
Specifically, there are numerous caveats in the specs including for example,
high-frequency (e.g, vibration) conditions where tD < 1 second, but none of
these caveats apply here.?
?
For example, with a power on dwell time of 6 minutes (system reaches thermal
equilibrium in < 1 minute) and a power off dwell time of 54 minutes (10% duty
cycle), I assume I can simply use tD = 6 minute dwells and Tsj = average solder
joint temperature over 60 minute cycle. Do you agree with this approach??
?
Another potential case of interest is if the duty cycle is reduced to something
less than 1 minute (but more than 1 second; not a vibration situation), such
that the stabilized operating temperature is not reached.
Can any valid fatigue calculations be performed in these cases if I can
determine a valid Tsj for a 1 minute tD??
?
Thanks in advance for your insights and assistance.?
?
Best regards,?
?
John N.?
?
________________________________?
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may be proprietary and are
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the sender.?
Please note that any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely those
of the author and do not necessarily represent those of ITT Corporation. The
recipient should check this e-mail and any attachments for the presence of
viruses. ITT accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted
by this e-mail.?
?
---------------------------------------------------?
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0?
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in?
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet?
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)?
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest?
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives?
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815?
----------------------------------------------------- ?
---------------------------------------------------?
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0?
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in?
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet?
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)?
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest?
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives?
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for
additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815?
-----------------------------------------------------?
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the BODY
(NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or (re-start)
delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or
(MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
|