Doesn't that get your Goat; thinking we need to be treated with kid
gloves.
Dewey
-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Douglas Pauls
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 8:30 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Gloved Hands / Fingerprints / Failure Articles
Thank you all. Much appreciated.
Would you all find benefit of a discussion of gloves in manufacturing in
the revision efforts for the IPC Cleaning Handbooks, currenly underway?
Doug Pauls
Rockwell Collins
"Roberts, Jon" <[log in to unmask]>
Sent by: TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
03/04/2009 09:14 AM
Please respond to
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>; Please respond to
"Roberts, Jon" <[log in to unmask]>
To
[log in to unmask]
cc
Subject
Re: [TN] Gloved Hands / Fingerprints / Failure Articles
Doug's 2 cents are worth more than most of can afford. I did enjoy
learning a new word (recalcitrant)from Mike Fenner. Jon
-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Douglas Pauls
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 8:44 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Gloved Hands / Fingerprints / Failure Articles
Kevin,
I will throw in my two cents worth. We do not wear gloves in our
facilities for most of the manufacturing process. They do in the clean
rooms and they do after final wash prior to conformal coat. The rest of
the time it is, in my opinion, a waste of time and money. Kind of an
odd
statement coming from me, but here is why I think so.
Gloves are there to prevent finger salts and oils from getting on the
assembly, where they would be a contamination risk. Our cleaning
processes are such that the last cleaning step is a mild one designed to
remove such salts and oils. The heavier residues have already been
removed in previous process steps. So, gloves are not really needed.
Here is why I think it is a waste of money to have gloves on anywhere
earlier in the process. The assumption that gloves keep your assemblies
clean is only true while the gloves themselves are clean. Run your
gloved
hands through your hair. New gloves. Touch a little of that uncured
adhesive. New gloves. Get a little flux from hand soldering on the
gloves. New gloves. You think that the operators are going to change
gloves that often? No. Think the manager for that area is going to
willingly pay for the truckloads of new gloves. Hell no. In some of
our
areas, the operators that apply silicone RTV adhesive to the boards wear
gloves because that RTV is hard to get off your hands. Think they
change
them often? Nope. When the boards get to conformal coating, there are
lots of dewet areas that mysteriously resemble fingerprint sized areas,
but without the convenient identifying fingerprints. Even though we
stress to our operators to handle boards by the edges only, it is
sometimes just not practical to do so. Then again, since we have that
final clean prior to coating, it is not as critical.
Now, if you are a true no-clean facility, that is another issue. If you
go the route of gloves, I would recommend you stay away from finger cots
and plastic gloves. They are uncomfortable and when you make the
operators uncomfortable, bad things happen. I would highly recommend
the
use of HyFlex gloves, which you can get from Techni-Tool. These are
cotton gloves with heavier rubberized palms and fingers, but the back
sides of the fingers and back side of the hand are open cotton, allowing
the gloves to breathe. Very comfortable, good tactical feel to them and
the surface is robust enough that you can clean off residues with mild
alcohol so they last for a long time. They cost a little more, but they
are worth the investment considering their cleanability and how long
they
last.
Doug Pauls
Rockwell Collins
Kevin Glidden <[log in to unmask]>
Sent by: TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
03/04/2009 07:26 AM
Please respond to
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>; Please respond to
Kevin Glidden <[log in to unmask]>
To
[log in to unmask]
cc
Subject
[TN] Gloved Hands / Fingerprints / Failure Articles
Hello everyone,
We are in the midst of a proposal from myself and manufacturing
engineering
to require use of gloves or finger cots throughout our PCB assembly
process.
We had considered that it really would only be required after final
cleaning, but for uniformity would require it all steps including
population. We have of course met with a real resistance, particularly
from
the final assemblers who are stating it doesn't matter once the
conformal
coat is on. I can see at least some logic in that, and admittedly a
large
portion of our argument is aesthetics (we don't want fingerprints on the
boards even after coating), but it would be really nice to have some
sort
of
scare tactic, like an article or something that related a PCB failure to
fingerprints or handling contamination. Anyone have such a thing?
Thanks!
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask]
or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
This communication is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named
herein and may contain business confidential and/or legally privileged
information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you
are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
copying of this e-mail and its contents is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this e-mail in error, kindly notify the sender by replying
to this message. In addition, please permanently delete the message and
any attachments without copying or disclosing the contents. Thank you
for
your cooperation.
THIS DOCUMENT AND/OR SHIPMENT MAY CONTAIN COMMODITY ITEMS, SOFTWARE OR
TECHNICAL DATA THAT IS CONTROLLED BY U.S. EXPORT LAW, AND MAY NOT BE
EXPORTED OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES OR TO NON U.S. PERSONS WITHOUT THE
APPROPRIATE EXPORT LICENSE FROM EITHER THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE OR
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE.
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask]
or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
|