TECHNET Archives

February 2009

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Fri, 6 Feb 2009 11:18:37 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (157 lines)
Hi Wayne
Well, I've been pointed to J-STD-002 for solderability testing and steam
"conditioning"...  Which specifies rosin flux - if they aren't using
that I will have concerns.

One thing I've seen though, on these parts and a couple of others in the
past, is that a dip test can be misleading.  I can dip a part and have
it look great, but as soon as you touch the lead with a soldering iron -
whoosh, there goes the solder.  We have seen this on marginal parts,
these included.   


regards,
 - Graham

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Thayer, Wayne
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 11:01 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Part solderability

Hi Graham!

We had big wetting problems with a tantalum cap last year and got a
similar run-around, but the manufacturer did eventually admit to a
plating problem and sent us documentation that they had since taken
corrective action.  But I suspect there were many other complaints and I
suspect they didn't issue a general recall for their production lot.

Possibly they could wet to the parts a little better than we could
because, like you, we are using RMA and they are evaluating the
wettability with a more active aqueous based process, like the majority
of CM's use.

Wayne Thayer

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Graham Collins
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 9:18 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Part solderability

Pin grid array parts, and they claim no change to their process...   -
we both didn't change anything :-)


regards,
 - Graham

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Gregory [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 10:17 AM
To: TechNet E-Mail Forum; Collins, Graham (FN) @ ESI
Subject: RE: [TN] Part solderability

Hi Graham!

What kind of parts are these? Have they changed the plating recently on
them?

Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Graham Collins
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 8:12 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Part solderability

Hi guys.
A while back I rejected a bunch of parts due to non wetting when we went
to solder them.

The manufacturer has come back with a response to our guys, saying that
they did a steam aging test on them and they passed fine.  He wants to
discuss it with us.

Obviously this is not good - they pass his test but I can't solder the
things.  Which makes me suspect his test... but makes him suspect my
process.  I don't know enough about steam aging tests to discuss this
well.  Obviously I need to ask what kind of flux he is using, but
anything else?

Our process is SnPb, we use RMA flux, and the wave soldering machine
runs at 500F for the pot.  This is on an assembly that we have happily
built for about 7 years, with the same manufacturer of part, and no
process changes that I can identify as significant.  The part is what I
would call marginally solderable, if we hand solder it and put a fair
bit of heat to the lead we can get it to solder, but not well or easily.
No previous soldering issues with the part.

regards,

Graham Collins
Halifax Production Engineering
L-3 communications Electronic Systems
(902) 873-2000 ext. 6215


---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET
Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the
posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the
archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please
visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for
additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET
Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the
posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the
archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please
visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for
additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may be proprietary and are
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the
sender.
Please note that any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are
solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of ITT
Corporation. The recipient should check this e-mail and any attachments
for the presence of viruses. ITT accepts no liability for any damage
caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail.

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET
Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the
posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the
archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please
visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for
additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2