TECHNET Archives

February 2009

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Anselmo <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, John Anselmo <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 12:49:33 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (46 lines)
Hi all,

I am having some difficulties with bridging on an SMD connector and need some help.  
I've searched the archives for similar problems but have come up empty so far.  Below are the details:

We are placing two different JMD connectors, one 60 pin and one 80 pin.
Stencil:  5 mil stencil and the apertures are 1:1 with the pads (.020" pitch, .012 pad width)
Paste:  Kester R562 (use a new jar every day)
Parts: Flex boards with .010" stiffeners supported by carriers (the flex panels are placed in a Durastone carrier that is recessed the thickness of the panel).
Printer:  MPM model AP25

We are measuring the paste parameters after printing with the CyberOptics 2000.  The data shows lots of variation in paste volume and thickness.
I am not sure how accurate the data is since the Cyberoptics does not verify correct alignment of the panel before it takes the measurement, but I do agree we have variation.
In general, it shows the paste thickness to be .007" to .009".

We see slumping of the paste sometimes before placement, mostly after placement.
I've changed the parameters of the printer (pressure, print speed, the snap off distance to ensure we are getting on-contact printing).
I've also had the operator rotate the stencil 90 deg to see if there was a difference in how we applied the paste (parallel or perpendicular to the length of the aperture).
We are using metal squeegees on the printer.
All of the above changes have resulted in no noticeable reduction in the number of bridges.

We are currently running a flex panel with 12 parts per array and we get 50% to 100% bridging per panel. Now you see why I am pulling my hair out.

The room parameters (throughout the day) are 70 to 74 deg F and 25% to 30% RH

My questions are:
1) What else can I look at that effects bridging?
2) Can the reflow (hot air forced) oven be causing some of the problem?
3) What should the paste thickness be with a 5 mil stencil?  
4) Should we go to a .001" reduction in the aperture on the stencil?  .002" reduction?
5) Is our panel carrier causing the problem?
6) Will rubber squeegees make a difference?

Frustrated in Montana,
John

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2