TECHNET Archives

February 2009

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 8 Feb 2009 12:34:06 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (99 lines)
No glass fiber brush!  Get hold of a horse or pig, with brass handle.  For what ever the reason, esd issue is less when use our four legs friends.  
--------------------------
Sent using BlackBerry


----- Original Message -----
From: TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sun Feb 08 12:13:14 2009
Subject: Re: [TN] Part solderability

Hi Graham,
steam test does not tell you much about underlying platings. Namely, if you 
are using ceramic PGAs, the pins are nickel plated Kovar with some gold 
upon. I have seen something like yours a number of time. It has to do with 
bad pretreatment before nickel plating, or bad nickel plating, which is not 
uncommon these days. Even plastic PGAs can have bad underplate. My advice: 
have a look at some cross sections in SEM/EDAX. Start with a glass fiber 
brush (kind of eraser) stroke. If the nickel is anomalous, you'll see it in 
a ordinary stereo microscope. If you are used to etching, a number of dips 
in  a not to concentrated HCl/H2SO4/H2O (strip gold at first of course) will 
probably reveal a lot even before SEM. I have some pictures on this, if I 
can find them, I'll send a pidgeon.
Inge


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Graham Collins" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 3:12 PM
Subject: [TN] Part solderability


Hi guys.
A while back I rejected a bunch of parts due to non wetting when we went to 
solder them.

The manufacturer has come back with a response to our guys, saying that they 
did a steam aging test on them and they passed fine.  He wants to discuss it 
with us.

Obviously this is not good - they pass his test but I can't solder the 
things.  Which makes me suspect his test... but makes him suspect my 
process.  I don't know enough about steam aging tests to discuss this well. 
Obviously I need to ask what kind of flux he is using, but anything else?

Our process is SnPb, we use RMA flux, and the wave soldering machine runs at 
500F for the pot.  This is on an assembly that we have happily built for 
about 7 years, with the same manufacturer of part, and no process changes 
that I can identify as significant.  The part is what I would call 
marginally solderable, if we hand solder it and put a fair bit of heat to 
the lead we can get it to solder, but not well or easily.  No previous 
soldering issues with the part.

regards,

Graham Collins
Halifax Production Engineering
L-3 communications Electronic Systems
(902) 873-2000 ext. 6215


---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to 
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to 
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 
847-615-7100 ext.2815
----------------------------------------------------- 

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------
This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2