TECHNET Archives

January 2009

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
jckim(김정철) <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, jckim(김정철) <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 30 Jan 2009 16:58:30 +0900
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)


That's what we're assuming as one of the biggest reasons.

But I've still questioned there's other important reason we must know.



Regarding one of the surface finish options for contact pad,

JEDEC recommends like below.





JEDEC ---------

Recommended plating for contact pad



 - Ni 2um(min) , Au 0.762um(min) 



 - Ni ?, Au 0.05~0.75um with 'corrosive barrier lubricant'

---------





Based on the JEDEC recommendation above, 

can we suggest our customer(set makers) for instance Au 0.5um with 'corrosive barrier lubricant' for contact pad finish?? 

- Of course suggested with some data which shows good reliability result. 







  ----- Original Message ----- 

  From: Joyce Koo 

  To: [log in to unmask] 

  Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 6:47 PM

  Subject: Re: [TN] NiAu plating on tab pad





  Based on the established reliability results years ago.  

  --------------------------

  Sent using BlackBerry





  ----- Original Message -----

  From: TechNet <[log in to unmask]>

  To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

  Sent: Thu Jan 29 02:40:54 2009

  Subject: [TN] NiAu plating on tab pad





  Hello Techneters,



  I want to know why do we have to do e'lytic Ni/Au plating on tab pad of memory module PCBs.

  I mean why specified surface finish and why specified 'gold' thickness.

  (mostly specified by set makers. Industry standards like IPC and JEDEC seems to just recommends.) 



  If Ni/Au plating with reduced thickness or other finishes can meet mechanical/reliability requirement in their socketing application,

  isn't it okay to use?



  Is there any siginificant reason in using e'lytic Ni/Au plating with specified thickness??



  Thanks for the kind answer in advance.

  Good day!



  jc



  Korea Circuit R&D



  ---------------------------------------------------------------------

  This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.



  ---------------------------------------------------

  Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0

  To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in

  the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet

  To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)

  To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest

  Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives

  Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815

  -----------------------------------------------------




ATOM RSS1 RSS2