TECHNET Archives

January 2009

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Kevin Glidden <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Kevin Glidden <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 27 Jan 2009 08:57:10 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (73 lines)
Steve,

I have a copy of the IPC-9252, and have not referenced it on any PCB
drawings.  My reasoning here is that ideally the drawing specifies only the
tests and test parameters to be performed (generally referenced in
IPC-6012), and not the procedures and/or fixturing used to complete the
required tests.  The Scope statement of IPC-9252 is as follows: "This
document is presented to assist in selecting the test analyzer, test
parameters, test data, and fixturing required to perform electrical test(s)
on all unpopulated printed boards without embedded components (i.e.,
resistors, capacitors, etc).  The users must determine the test parameters
and fixturing requirements to test for continuity (open), isolation
(leakage/short), and other special characteristics (i.e., impedance, hipot,
capacitance, current carrying capacity, etc.) that will satisfactorily
evaluate the critical electrical characteristics of specific printed boards.
The testing levels in this document define some of these parameters."  I
view IPC-9252 as a technical document used to assist selecting which tests
you want or need, and also for a better understanding of how specified tests
are performed.

My 2-cents.

Kevin Glidden
Manufacturing Engineer
Luminescent Systems Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From: Sauer, Steve (Xetron) [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 7:10 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Inquiry on IPC-9252

Good Morning,
I've been asked to look into adding IPC-9252 "Requirements for Electrical
Testing of Unpopulated Printed Boards" to our PWB drawings.
Although we currently have electrical test requirements on the drawings that
are adequate, I'm skeptical about imposing requirements that may be
superficial.  Does anyone have experience using this document?  Is this is a
widely used standard?  Pro's and Con's are appreciated. 
Thanks in advance for your responses.

Steve

Steve Sauer, CEPM
Sr. Project Engineer
Northrop Grumman Xetron
Cincinnati, OH
513-881-3368
[log in to unmask]

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the
BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet
NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send
e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the archives of
previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please visit IPC web
site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2