TECHNET Archives

December 2008

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Nieznanski, John A - SSD" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Nieznanski, John A - SSD
Date:
Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:33:27 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (385 lines)
Hi Werner,

Thanks for confirming this calculation.

Is it correct to conclude that the reason you are calling this N50 (and not some other percentage) is because I have limited samples of each component type and thus the first failure on the single chain of "m" components essentially defines the characteristic lifetime (or N50) for all "m" components on the chain?

I have some chains with as few as 8 components and other chains which as many as 40 components. These also need to be analyzed appropriately, so I want to confirm the analysis approach for all the chains in my test.

If this isn't the reason, please let me know how we justify the claim of calling this N50.

Thanks again.

John



________________________________
From: Werner engelmaier [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 1:38 PM
To: [log in to unmask]; Nieznanski, John A - SSD
Subject: Re: [TN] to apply partition correction on individual daisy chains or not?

Hi John,
The underlying assumption in Eq. 16 is an adequate sample size (32).

What you are doing is not partitioning a component, however, but daisy-chaining components together.
In this case, what you did is correct, because you record the first failed component of 10, and so your eq. should read like this:

Nf(50%,component) = Nf(50%,m daisy-chained components) * [m]^(1/BETA)





                        = 800 * (10)^1/4





                        = 1422
Plotting things like this on a Weibull graph typically is very helpful.

Werner

-----Original Message-----
From: Nieznanski, John A - SSD <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:43 pm
Subject: [TN] to apply partition correction on individual daisy chains or not?

Hi TechNet List Gurus,










If I have several different serial daisy chains undergoing accelerated





reliability testing per IPC-SM-785, can I apply partition correction (IPC-SM-785





Eq. 16) to calculate an "effective" Nf @test (X%) for each daisy chain?  Each





chain only has a single component type, but there are different numbers of





components in each chain.










For example, if the first chain has 10 two-terminal leadless SMT components





(assume BETA=4), and the first IPC-SM-785 failure occurs at 800 cycles, then per





Eq. 16:










Nf (component) = Nf (m partitions) * [1/m] ^ (1/BETA)





                        = 800 * (10) ^ 1/4





                        = 1422










So with 10 components in the first partition or daisy chain, then Nf @test





(component) = Nf @test (10%) = 1422.










A more conservative analysis neglecting the partition correction would be to say





Nf (10%) = 800.










Which way makes the most sense?










From Nf @test (10%) and BETA, I can calculate Nf @test (50%), then apply the





acceleration factors to get Nf @use (50%), then extrapolate to get Nf @use (1%)





and Nf @use (0.1%).










Best regards,










John Nieznanski















________________________________





This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may be proprietary and are





intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are





addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the sender.





Please note that any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely those





of the author and do not necessarily represent those of ITT Corporation. The





recipient should check this e-mail and any attachments for the presence of





viruses. ITT accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted





by this e-mail.










---------------------------------------------------





Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0





To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> with following text in





the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet





To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to





[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)





To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to





[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>: SET Technet Digest





Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives





Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for





additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> or





847-615-7100 ext.2815





-----------------------------------------------------





---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2