TECHNET Archives

December 2008

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Igoshev, Vladimir" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Igoshev, Vladimir
Date:
Fri, 12 Dec 2008 10:14:53 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2387 lines)
Well, it's obviously better than nothing :-). I'm curious, though
whether it works always or "it depends". 

 

Vladimir

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Werner engelmaier
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 10:05 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Xbox360 BGAs

 


 Sorry,
that's what comes from doing things waiting for an airplane- should have
been "...micro-voiding at grain boundary intersections,..."

Werner


 

-----Original Message-----
From: Igoshev, Vladimir <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 4:26 pm
Subject: Re: [TN] Xbox360 BGAs










Hi Werner,

 

I got used to calling it grain boundary triple junction (it's just
probably different terminologies). However, since I know what you meant
I'm confused with the whole sentence: "In any case, grain coarsening
comes first, micro-voiding and grain





boundary intersections next...", triple joints are there to begin with.

 

Regards,

 

Vladimir

 

________________________________

From: Werner engelmaier [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 4:21 PM
To: Igoshev, Vladimir; [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Xbox360 BGAs

 

 

Hi Vladimir,

"Grain boundary intersections" occur where 3 or more grain boundaries
come together. 




Purely metallurgically speaking, things get more messy on a scale
smaller than grain size, but 




in terms of SJ rel consideration on the grain-size level is sufficient.









Werner





 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Igoshev, Vladimir <[log in to unmask]>
To: TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>; Werner engelmaier
<[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 3:59 pm
Subject: RE: [TN] Xbox360 BGAs

Hi Werner,









That is a very legitimate s
cenario :-). The only thing you mentioned and




I don't know what you meant was "grain boundary intersections". 









Regards,









Vladimir









-----Original Message-----




From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> ] On
Behalf Of Werner engelmaier




Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 2:26 PM




To: [log in to unmask]




Subject: Re: [TN] Xbox360 BGAs














 




Hi Vladimir,




The old consultants' mantra applies: 'It depends.'




The damage process in ACT is somewhat different than in product, because




the solder grain structure 




coarsens preferentially in bands in the locii of highest loading; for




product, the whole SJ grain structure 




coarsens because of the much longer time scale.




In any case, grain coarsening comes first, micro-voiding and grain




boundary intersections next, micro-cracks




forming from these micro-voids, growing and coalescing to failure. 




The first parts of the process are enhanced by higher Ts, but once




cracks are formed, crack propagation is 




faster at lower Ts.









Werner



















 









-----Original Message-----




From: Igoshev, Vladimir <[log in to unmask]>




To: [log in to unmask]




Sent: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:50 am




Subject: Re: [TN] Xbox360 BGAs



















=0
A

































Hi Bob,









I want to add to the previous Werner's e-mail. To be exact, solder




joints fail because of crack growing. Obviously, there are shouldn't be




any cracks in as formed solder joints, so a crack in a joint has to be




formed to result in final failure. 









Overall plastic deformation of solder joints (accumulating creep-fatigue




damage, as Werner said) will result in formation of a crack. However,




I'm not sure whether the overall plastic deformation or localized




processes around the crack tip will play a role in its further




propagation. 









Regards,









Vladimir









-----Original Message-----




From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> ] On
Behalf Of Robert Kondner




Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 6:57 PM




To: [log in to unmask]




Subject: Re: [TN] Xbox360 BGAs









Hi,









 Ok, thanks.









 Dare I ask further but:









  If the material creeps at normal/high temps that would tend to reduce




the




stresses, right? Why then would a joint tend to fail on repeated




temperature




changes, especially going hot?









  That Xbox photo showed really squished solder balls. At elevated




temperature the creep was probably high and the ball
s squished due to




the




force of the bottom board warping. (An Al heat sink probably holds the




top




chip pretty flat.) 









  If balls got that squished to the thickness of paper I would almost




expect




shorts to form between squished balls. Do we know if the unit failed




with




opens or shorts. 









  Would placing a rigid metal stiffener under the bottom side (Bottom




side




heat sink) help reduce warp? Would under fill on a large BGA help do the




same thing? 









Thanks,




Bob Kondner 









-----Original Message-----




From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> ] On
Behalf Of Werner engelmaier




Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 6:30 PM




To: [log in to unmask]




Subject: Re: [TN] Xbox360 BGAs









 Hi Bob,




Forget what you know about metals when talking solder---most of it does




not




apply; we do not use any other metal this close to ts melting




temperature.




At Th>=0.5 [Th=T[K]/Tm[K]] all metals will creep significantly. Thus,




any




elastic strains get converted to plastic strains in short [depending on




T]




order, thus reducing any stresses. So the pre-stressed concrete analogy




does




not apply. 




At those T's stresses are not the issue, it is displacement strains.










Werner














 














 









-----Original Message-----




From: Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>




To: 'TechNet E-Mail Forum' <[log in to unmask]>; 'Werner engelmaier'




<[log in to unmask]>




Sent: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 8:57 am




Subject: RE: [TN] Xbox360 BGAs






















































Hi,









  I have a general question about:









  Solder joint strains cause by thermal expansion differences.









  It would seem to me that cooling of a assembly after reflow would




introduce built in strains. It seems very much like a pre-stressed




concrete




beam. It would seem that exposing a device to cold temperature would




increase these stresses. 









Question:









  Do crystals in a solder ball "Flow" at room temperature?









  Can a solder ball be annealed with a soak at some temperature?









Thanks,




Bob Kondner 









-----Original Message-----




From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> ] On
Behalf Of Werner engelmaier




Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 6:36 PM




To: [log in to unmask]




Subject: Re: [TN] Xbox360 BGAs









 




Hi David,




You are somewhat off.




Nothing a SJ can do t
o stop being deformed---whatever the expansion




mismatch




is will wind up in the SJ. 




HOWEVER, for the same thermal expansion mismatch, different solder joint




heights will result in different cyclic strain ranges 




[ that is why IBM makes solder columns].




The corner balls seethe highest thermal expansion mismatch because of




the




largest DNP, and the strain is further increased because of the




compression.









Werner




 














 














 









-----Original Message-----




From: David Tremmel <[log in to unmask]>




To: [log in to unmask]




Sent: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 10:17 am




Subject: [TN] Xbox360 BGAs






















































Hello Technetters,









 









Since I have had some people wanting to see pictures, I have resubmitted




my




email with some corrections.









 









I had someone who got a used Xbox360 that failed and when we




disassembled




it, we found they had put an aftermarket heat sink on two of the largest




BGAs.









 









The original Microsoft heatsinks make contact with the dies (the BGAs




are




flipchip designs) and have four arms that extend past the corners 
of the




BGA




and then have posts which go through the board to a latching piece on




the




bottom of the PCB directly underneath the BGA which adds tension to make




good physical contact with the top of the die and the bottom of the heat




sink but does not add sufficient pressure to deform the PCB.  The




aftermarket heatsinks have posts with spacers above the PCB and washers




below the PCB but the spacers above the PCB are not the proper length




and




after time, the PCB warps upwards and the spacing at the corner of the




BGAs




was severely compressed to the point where I could not put 2 pieces of




paper




between the corner of the BGA and the PCB.  The solder spheres are 25




mil




and are probably being compressed to less than 10 mil.









 









Anywho, this is what I think has the failure mechanism is and I would




appreciate some feedback from the gurus:









 









While the chip operates, it generates heat which expands the device to




some




degree in the X,Y axis









Part of the job of the solder spheres is to sink the heat to the logic




board




so the thermal expansion of the BGA does not act like a sheer force at




the




solder ball interfaces.  The logic board also expands due to the heat




and=0
A



any CTE differences between the BGA and the logic board deform the




solder




spheres to some degree.  The BGA substrate size is 35mm x 35mm and the




solder spheres on the corner of the BGA are subject to the greatest




sheer




forces which, in this case, is detrimental.









 









Due to the compression of the solder spheres at the corners because of




the




poor heatsink design, they are unable to deform and any CTE difference




between the BGA and the logic board are turned into sheer forces and




cause




ball/interface failures.









I also think that the constant pressure of the lead free solder spheres




would greatly increase the chances of tin whiskers.









 









I have a picture of just how bad the solder sphere compression is if




anyone




is interested.









 









Am I way off base?









 









Thank you in advance for any correction in my theory.  A confirmation




would




be better!!









 









Thank you,









 









David Tremmel









 <http://valurecovery.com/> http://ValuRecovery.com









 














---------------------------------------------------




Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LIST
SERV 15.0




To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text




in




the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet




To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to 




[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)




To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to 




[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest




Search the archives of previous posts at:




http://listserv.ipc.org/archives




Please visit IPC web site




http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16




for 




additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 




847-615-7100 ext.2815




-----------------------------------------------------
























 














---------------------------------------------------




Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0




To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text




in




the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet




To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to




[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)




To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to




[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest




Search the archives of previous posts at:




http://listserv.ipc.org/archives




Please visit IPC web site




http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
0A


for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask]




or




847-615-7100 ext.2815




-----------------------------------------------------
























 














---------------------------------------------------




Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0




To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text




in




the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet




To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to




[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)




To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to




[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest




Search the archives of previous posts at:




http://listserv.ipc.org/archives




Please visit IPC web site




http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16




for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask]




or




847-615-7100 ext.2815




-----------------------------------------------------









---------------------------------------------------




Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0




To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text




in




the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet




To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to




[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)





To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to




[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest




Search the archives of previous posts at:




http://listserv.ipc.org/archives




Please visit IPC web site




http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional




information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100




ext.2815




-----------------------------------------------------









---------------------------------------------------




Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0




To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text




in




the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet




To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to 




[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)




To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to 




[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest




Search the archives of previous posts at:




http://listserv.ipc.org/archives




Please visit IPC web site




http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for 




additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 




847-615-7100 ext.2815




-----------------------------------------------------
























 














---------------------------------------------------




Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0


=0
A
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text




in




the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet




To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to




[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)




To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to




[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest




Search the archives of previous posts at:




http://listserv.ipc.org/archives




Please visit IPC web site




http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional




information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100




ext.2815




-----------------------------------------------------










---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to 
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to 
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for 
additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------



 


---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2