LEADFREE Archives

December 2008

Leadfree@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Wenger, George M." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
(Leadfree Electronics Assembly Forum)
Date:
Thu, 4 Dec 2008 18:36:53 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (186 lines)
From the tone of your email I get the impression that "
Richard,



From the tone of your email I get the impression that "BS" stands for

"Biased Stadem".



Fortunately, I know that your biases and my biases for IAg are founded

on real experience rather than rumors.



Regards,

George

George M. Wenger

Andrew Wireless Solutions

Senior Principal FMA / Reliability Engineer

40 Technology Drive, Warren, NJ 07059

(908) 546-4531 [Office]  (732) 309-8964 [Cell]

[log in to unmask]

 



-----Original Message-----

From: Stadem, Richard D. [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 

Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 5:55 PM

To: (Leadfree Electronics Assembly Forum); Wenger, George M.

Subject: RE: [LF] Pro's and Con's of using Immersion Silver



I have to agree with what George said, but I can tell you that I have a

lot of experience with IAg boards, including super large ones that were

40" wide by 24" high and weighed 75 lbs. I have never had any issues

with it, and I have been an advocate for IAg for many years. However, I

understand that sometimes ENIG is the proper choice, and also

applications where neither one is practical.



As far as why many still use ENIG, here are some reasons I have been

told:

	1. Because it is easier to solder to gold (BS, you don't solder

to the gold)

	2. Because you get a better solder joint soldering to gold (BS,

with ENIG you are soldering to the nickel

underneath)

	3. Because you need the added strength of the nickel plating in

the vias (in some applications, true).

	4. It costs more, so it must be more reliable (Absolute BS)

	5. It performs better in high impedance, high frequency circuits

than IAg (Absolute BS, the opposite is in fact 		   generally

true)

	6. Well, we always have used ENIG, and we just boilerplate the

requirements from fab drawing to new fab drawing (I 	   have had so

many design engineers tell me this)

	7. We need the gold for contact switches or wirebonding purposes

(true).

	8. IAg does not solder well after 6 months (BS, it is easier to

form a good SJ with the copper underneath provided 	   you have

packaged and stored the IAg boards properly in the first place).

	9. We have always used ENIG from a particular PWB vendor without

any issues, and are hesitant to change. (That's a 	   darn good

reason!)  



-----Original Message-----

From: Leadfree [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Wenger, George M.

Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 3:52 PM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: [LF] Pro's and Con's of using Immersion Silver



Tim,



We've used IAg since 1996 and have had extremel





Tim,



We've used IAg since 1996 and have had extremely good results.  You're

probably going to get all kinds of answers about solderability, storage,

and long term reliability but my short answer is that from my

prospective the solderability and long term reliability is better than

ENIG and the storage can be as good if you be careful where you store

it.



As for the question of why there are still a lot of companies using

ENIG, the best answers will come from those who are still using it.  It

is a good, flat solderable surface and as long as you don't run into a

problem with solder joint failures there is probably not a lot of reason

to change to an alternative.  However,  I assume there are also lots of

companies who had problems with ENIG that have switch to IAg.



Regards,

George

George M. Wenger

Andrew Wireless Solutions

Senior Principal FMA / Reliability Engineer 40 Technology Drive, Warren,

NJ 07059

(908) 546-4531 [Office]  (732) 309-8964 [Cell] [log in to unmask]

 



-----Original Message-----

From: Leadfree [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Tim Boyer

Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 3:16 PM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: [LF] Pro's and Con's of using Immersion Silver



Currently we use Immersion Gold for our ROHS boards.



We are looking into changing to Immersion Silver.



What differences are there in solderability, storage, long term

reliability, operating temperatures,



etc?



Why are allot of companies still using Immersion Gold over Nickel for

ROHS boards?



 



Tim Boyer, CID+





------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV

1.8d To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following

text in the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree To

temporarily stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks

send: SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL)

Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please

visit IPC web site

http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional

information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100

ext.2815

------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------





No virus found in this incoming message.

Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com

Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.13/1828 - Release Date:

12/4/2008 8:05 AM

------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------

This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain

privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.  

If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately

and delete the original.  Any unauthorized use of this email is

prohibited.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------

[mf2]





------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV

1.8d

To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text

in

the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree

To temporarily stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks

send: SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL)

Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives

Please visit IPC web site

http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional

information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100

ext.2815

------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------





No virus found in this incoming message.

Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 

Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.13/1828 - Release Date:

12/4/2008 8:05 AM

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This message is for the designated recipient only and may

contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.  

If you have received it in error, please notify the sender

immediately and delete the original.  Any unauthorized use of

this email is prohibited.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[mf2]



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree
To temporarily stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks send: SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2