Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 2 Nov 2008 13:45:30 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Reflow I never read that anyone saw a need to do CPK on reflow. The CPK
should be done on the placement machines. A good reflow oven has only a 2
degree C variation from rail to rail. The reflow usually corrects parts that are
shifted or rotated a little with a good board and stencil design.
DOE on stencils should be tied to squeege pressure and speed as well as
cleaning and chemistry used to clean the squeeqee, number of machine clean
cycles (cleaning after X number of prints), dry or cleaning fluid in printer.
The DOE beside the obvious stencil thickness, laser cut versus electroform etc
and aperature required for PB-free versus tin/lead are the following for small
components and BGAs which are usually the ones with issues.
In the DOE I would select Small Rnets with concave versus convex ("T"
shaped lead) to be added to whatever components you have in mind. There is
a new taller but narrow SMT switch with ony 2 pads, that tilt when they
reflow. This one is a challange. Another point to test is the shifting of pads
towards the heel versus the toe to prevent opens. Stencil designers have said
that opposite of what you may think, adding paste to the rear or heel actually
corrects opens at the toe. The paste flows toward the toe and up the lead
during reflow. Shifting the pad or aperture toward the toe to fix an open may
not help because the leads pushes the paste away during placement, instead
of fixing the open you may get a short or still have the open. A DOE board
should have some pads with uneven etches to test stencil designs that may
prevent components from shifting by changing the amount of paste via width
and length reductions. A DOE with kings crown versus home plate pad designs
or staggered tear drop for IC's may be selected. Some say the kings crown
may lead to tombstoning but I haven't seen it. I know the homeplate design
may be good if you have an automated stencil cleaner but if the operator
does manual cleaning a stencil with all those sharp points would be risky. I'd
bet you'd have some damaged stencils if the point is bent up when the steel
squeegee hits them.
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
|
|
|