TECHNET Archives

October 2008

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:25:18 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (111 lines)
Eric,

IMHO, the bad news on vapor phase are the hazardous chemistry and waste
issues. I really don't think it would be economical to use in a high
volume commercial environment. I never heard good things about in line
vapor phase units in a SnPb (or Lead Free) production environment,
regardless of volume.

Good news, by being in an inert atmosphere, which will increase the
process window by allowing less than optimum material to be soldered, I
think it would be worth considering for specific low volume applications
i.e. aerospace. As far as generating a thermal profile, depending upon
the unit I don't really see a problem with it having done it on a
Corpane VP23BU vapor phase batch unit. I found the profile easy to
generate, maintain, and control. It has been a while since I fooled
around with it - I'm assuming that the chemistries can reach the higher
Lead Free Soldering temperatures for SAC.

A neat thing about a batch unit is that by sticking you head above the
cooling coils, you can see the actual soldering process as opposed to
waiting for the hardware to come out of the convection oven. Which
explains a lot...

Hope this helps. Good Luck.

Lee Whiteman, PMP
Senior Member Engineering Staff
L-3 Communications East
Telephone: (856) 338-3508
FAX: (856) 338-2906
E-Mail: [log in to unmask]
 

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Eric CHRISTISON
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 8:57 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Vapor Phase Soldering - The way Forward?

Subject
Re: [TN] FW: [LF] Vapor Phase Soldering






" I should also opine that when soldering RoHS-compliant assemblies
using
lead-free solder paste, you will probably get a much better yield with
VPS than you ever will with convection. Especially in the case of SAC
solders. "


Richard's statement prompts me to ask a related question.

The subject of vapour phase soldering came up in a review that I 
attended this morning on the qualification of a new semiconductor 
package. It was stated that VP soldering would become a lot more popular

in the future because of a number of advantages it has over hot air when

using it on lead free components.

What is the opinion of Technet on this? I'm particularily interested on 
predictions of it's usage for the manufacture of high volume PWB assys 
for consumer electronics.

Thanks,

-- 
Eric Christison Msc
Mechanical Engineer
Consumer & Micro group
Imaging Division

STMicroelectronics (R&D) Ltd
33 Pinkhill
Edinburgh EH12 7BF
United Kingdom

Tel:	+44 (0)131 336 6165
Fax:	+ 44 (0)131 336 6001

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2