The problem with tin and lead is that it is so 'flat' , seen from a
nano-level. Conductive silver (or other metal) filled adhesives do not stick
to the metal part chemically, at least not on a essential basis, but rather
on a mechanical one. There are more binding mechanisms, but let's discuss
the one that is most important for succeeding for glueing to a solder. A
solder is amazingly smooth and dense, still seen microscopically, depending
on the way it solidifies. One could see that indirectly by putting a drop of
water on the solder: it forms a sphere instead of wetting and spreading.
High surface tension, with other words. The solder could not break the
droplet's surface tension. Adhesives have a liquidous part, which is
necessary for being dispensable. That ingredient is not very wetting by
nature either, and furthermore, the whole paste has a very high viscosity.
Now, we want a surface that is like a burdock, or how can I describe it, a
surface with billions of microscopic superficial voids and cavities. If the
wet phase of the glue has matching surface tension, and a low viscosity, and
you give it time, it will creep into all the microscratches and after curing
creating millions of micro'hooks'. How do we obtain such a condition with
solder then? You need both remove the always present oxide and also create
the rough surface. We found that a slight etching could do the job. We
were in a situation when we just had to fix it. Did not like it, but got a
acceptable result. I don't recommend the method, too many traps to fall
into, but thought it might be of interest to someone, who could perhaps
develop the idea on a more adequate way, the inventor of 1LMI, for
instance. Let's see if he takes the bate.
What adhesive? Don't remember exactly, think it was a 1,000 mPas light
curing epoxy, probably from Epotek, as it was named at that time. The
bonding had no requirements on being very strong, and was not either. Just
had to keep a grounded copper foil. Soldering was forbidden of a special
reason.
Inge
----- Original Message -----
From: "Douglas O. Pauls" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 12:06 PM
Subject: Re: [TN] "Conductive" Bonding Material
> Thermally conductive or electrically conductive?
>
> Doug Pauls
> Rockwell Collins
>
>
>
> "Joe Lara (Select Circuits)" <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent by: TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
> 10/01/2008 01:03 PM
> Please respond to
> TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>; Please respond to
> "Joe Lara (Select Circuits)" <[log in to unmask]>
>
>
> To
> [log in to unmask]
> cc
>
> Subject
> [TN] "Conductive" Bonding Material
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Good Morning / Afternoon Tech Net Guru's,
>
> Has anyone used a "Conductive" bonding material on a ceramic circuit
> board?
> If so what material was used and what was the quality of the result.
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> Joe
>
>
> ***************** E-mail Confidentiality Disclaimer *****************
>
> This e-mail message may contain privileged or confidential information. If
> you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose, use,
> disseminate, distribute, copy or rely upon this message or attachment in
> any way. If you received this e-mail message in error, please return by
> forwarding the message and its attachments to the sender. Select Circuits
> and its affiliates do not accept liability for any errors, omissions,
> corruption or virus in the contents of this message or any attachments.
>
> ***************** E-mail Confidentiality Disclaimer *****************
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
> for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
> 847-615-7100 ext.2815
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
> for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
> 847-615-7100 ext.2815
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
|