TECHNET Archives

September 2008

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bob METCALF <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Bob METCALF <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 24 Sep 2008 17:36:08 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (91 lines)
Anand,

The phos content is usually controlled by the plating rate. Various ENIG 
manufactures do contain different phos content so it is best to check with 
the manufacturer for their spec for a desirable phos range. 

The reason that there is an upper limit on Nickel thickness is the plated 
deposit is brittle. As the thickness increases the brittleness increases. 
The IPC has determined that the safe upper limit is 236 um. I am not aware 
of any other major drawbacks from a thicker deposit. If I see a board with 
a thickness of 400 um I would be concerned that the plating rate is two 
high and the process should be looked at to determine if it is being run 
within the manufactures recommendations.

Regards,

Bob Metcalf
Atotech Western Regional Manager

Cell 714-334-7667
E-Mail [log in to unmask] 

This e-mail and any attachments hereto are business documents of Atotech 
USA Inc. and may contain CONFIDENTIAL OR PROPRIETARY BUSINESS INFORMATION. 
Unauthorized disclosure and/or use of information contained in this email 
is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not read, 
use, disseminate or copy this message or any other files transmitted with 
it. 



Anand Paliwal <[log in to unmask]> 
Sent by: TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
09/24/2008 10:33 AM
Please respond to
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>; Please respond to
Anand Paliwal <[log in to unmask]>


To
[log in to unmask]
cc

Subject
[TN] ENIG Gold plating






Hi Technetees,

I have some Queries on IPC ENIG 4552  Specifications 

which does not specify Phosphourus content and 
what could be the effects if Electroless Nickel thickness is Greater 236.2 
uin.

As In one of my Board i found this nickel thickness as 400um.

Thanks for reply in advanced.....!


 

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to 
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to 
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------


---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2