TECHNET Archives

September 2008

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Tony Steinke <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Tony Steinke <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 23 Sep 2008 09:02:24 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (77 lines)
Your supplier should do a double pass of soldermask. It is true that they
can only achieve .001(assuming they are applying LPI mask) and at the knee
of the trace maybe .0005 thick.

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Phil Nutting
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 8:29 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Solder mask thickness

Good afternoon,

OK, here is this afternoon's question.  Solder mask thickness, what is the
"industry standard"?  We currently specify 0.001" thickness and this may be
fine on a large area when tested via IP TM-650, 2.5.6.1.  Now use 2 ounce
copper traces in a normal board configuration.  Our board vendors are
stating that they cannot hold the 0.001" thickness at the edges of the etch,
it is more like 0.0003".  And if we spec 4 ounce or 6 ounce I'm sure it
doesn't get any better.

How are you specifying solder mask thickness on your heavy copper weight
circuit boards?

Do your board vendors use two coats of mask to obtain the thickness needed
to comply?

IPC-SM-840 section 3.4 says it must meet the requirements of section 3.8.1,
thickness of 0.001" at 500 Vdc.

Your guidance is requested.

Thanks,

Phil Nutting

Note: All the information contained in this e-mail and its attachments is
proprietary to Kaiser Systems, Inc. and it may not be reproduced without the
prior written permission of sender.  If you have received this email in
error, please immediately return it to sender and delete the copy you
received.

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG. 
Version: 7.5.526 / Virus Database: 270.7.0/1685 - Release Date: 9/22/2008
4:08 PM
 

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG. 
Version: 7.5.526 / Virus Database: 270.7.0/1685 - Release Date: 9/22/2008
4:08 PM
 

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2