TECHNET Archives

September 2008

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Stadem, Richard D." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Stadem, Richard D.
Date:
Wed, 10 Sep 2008 08:18:08 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (130 lines)
Hi, Fabrice

Yes, Alan's method is a good one. The issue here is the X-ray "blooming" makes it difficult to know just where you are in terms of being able to measure a round white image, such as a void. One must understand that the X-ray measures the image you see on the screen. The software is actually an image processor. If the voltage or current level is set a little high, the void, which is white, blooms slightly and appears larger than it actually is, and this image is "measured" by the machine software and as such the voids are exaggerated. By using a ball bearing of a known diameter, you can "calibrate" the power and current levels on the X-ray until the image measured matches the known diameter of the ball bearing, eliminating the bloom factor, and then measure the voids, possibly with some minor focusing.
The newer X-rays, particularly the Dage and the Phoenix models, use some algorithms that will automatically focus on a dark object and perform an autocalibration adjustment. Then they continue on to perform the automatic measuring, and they are remarkably accurate, down into the micron range.
I use a similar method when using older X-rays, but what I use is a small scrap board with a BGA attached that has voids of a known size. The BGA on this board is already microsectioned, and I measure the 1/2 spheres with voids of a known diameter which were verified under a precision scope with reticule. This only works from a 2D standpoint, however. Alan's ball bearing is going to provide a standard from any angle.


-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of fabrice pires
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 7:40 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] precise void size measurement

Alan,

I guess these ball bearings helped you to test image quality of tested equipment and calibrate the Xray equipment to define size of BGA balls and other things.

But do you thing metal balls can be used as precise calibration for measurement of voids inside BGA balls?
I mean voids are lack of material and balls are presence of material (metal).
In other way, does the equipment setups for correct observation of ball bearings is really the same for the voids observation and size measurement?

Thanks in advance for your input.
Fabrice

Alan Kreplick a écrit :
> Fabrice,
>
> When I was evaluating X-Ray equipment, I brought precision ball 
> bearings (I think they were .050").
>
> Each machine had some sort of measurement tool, but no matter the 
> machine or changing focus, tilting 50-75 degrees, etc., the .050" ball 
> bearing was my benchmark.
>
> To stop the ball bearing from rolling around on the table or assembly, 
> I glued it to a small piece of conductive composite material 
> (left-over wave solder fixture stock).
>
>
> Al Kreplick
> Sr. Manufacturing Engineer
> Circuit Card Assembly
> Air-toAir/Precision Strike/Land Combat Raytheon Integrated Defense 
> Systems 978-470-9931office
> 978-245-1702 pager
> 978-470-4307 fax
> [log in to unmask]
>
>
>
> fabrice pires <[log in to unmask]> Sent by: TechNet 
> <[log in to unmask]>
> 09/09/2008 11:01 AM
> Please respond to
> TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>; Please respond to fabrice 
> pires <[log in to unmask]>
>
>
> To
> [log in to unmask]
> cc
>
> Subject
> [TN] precise void size measurement
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Techneters,
>
> I would like your advices on the best way to calibrate XRay pictures 
> in aim to measure precisely voids inside BGA balls, after assembly.
> Everyone should agree on the fact slight setup variation on XR 
> equipment could change significantly the void size results.
>
> Do you have any trick to improve precision measures whatever the XR 
> equipment?
> Does the use of any reference/calibration on boards exists in that aim?
>
> Fabrice
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To 
> unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in 
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt 
> or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing 
> per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> Search the archives of previous posts at: 
> http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please visit IPC web site 
> http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
> for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at 
> [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To 
> unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in 
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt 
> or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET 
> Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the 
> posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the 
> archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please 
> visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 
> for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at 
> [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>   

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2