TECHNET Archives

August 2008

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Gumpert, Ben" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Gumpert, Ben
Date:
Thu, 7 Aug 2008 08:46:43 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Technetters,

	Can anyone offer advice on using a no-flow underfill (fluxing underfill or epoxy flux) on a circuit card assembly?

	I thought underfill was supposed to have a CTE that was close to a compromise between the other CTEs of the assembly (solder, PWB, component) but it seems that all the no-flow underfills have CTEs (55-75 ppm/°C) that are higher than all the other assembly materials. Should I not be worried about this amount of mismatch?


Thanks in advance,
Ben


---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2