TECHNET Archives

August 2008

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
James Verrette <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, James Verrette <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 26 Aug 2008 10:25:29 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (93 lines)
What characteristics of the end use environment would cause IAg to not
be an appropriate finish and why?
 
Jim Verrette
Senior Electrical Engineer
 
------------------------------

Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 08:24:35 -0500

From: "Stadem, Richard D." <[log in to unmask]>

Subject: Re: ENIG White paper

Dave,

You write as if you are not at all familiar with IAg, which is totally

understandable. However, IAg has been around in full production mode for

many years now, and is rapidly becoming the most-used finish in the

market. Do not confuse it with immersion tin finish, which has little or

no shelf life.

IAg-finished circuit boards have a recommended shelf or storage life of

about 1 year. However, if packaged properly in a hermetically sealed bag

with silver saver paper liners, and stored away from sulfates, it is

possible to use boards up to 5 years old or even longer with no issues

whatsoever. All you need to do is call out the packaging on the

fabrication drawing per IPC 4553.

I have soldered IAg boards that sat around exposed to the elements for

more than 4 years in previous lives, and they soldered up just fine, no

change in the DPMO.

Some of the bare boards we use here at GD are 34" by 40", 48 layers,

1/2" thick, cost is about $48,000 each. Their finish is IAg. =20

I have had a lot of experience with IAg over the past 10 years or so,

having seen at least 150,000 IAg boards assembled and soldered with

every type of component you can think of, and I have never experienced

any issues with them. I have experienced many, many issues with ENIG,

however, and that is the finish that would keep me up at night waiting

for the bomb to go off. There are many reliability issues associated

with ENIG such as black pad, brittle nickel, etc., etc, but just think

about the fact that you are soldering to nickel, which has a dissolution

rate about 50 times slower than copper.

Should you ever have a solderability issue with IAg, you can have the

fabricator rework the finish. If you have an issue with ENIG, the only

thing you can do is rework your scrap account.

However, you need to take the end-use environment into consideration

when you select a circuit board finish. ENIG (unfortunately) may be your

best choice. I would fully qualify just one assembly at a time, and I

would fully qualify it. For Space use, I would not suggest IAg.

-----Original Message-----


---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2