TECHNET Archives

August 2008

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Wolfgang Erat <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Wolfgang Erat <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 15 Aug 2008 14:17:38 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (98 lines)
If I would find the defects you describe I would not worry about sample
plans but would reject the entire lot and probably find a new vendor.

Cheers, Wolfgang

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Dave Schaefer
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 2:44 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] IPC6012 Sample Frequency / Method

A product I am working on recently experienced a higher than normal drop
out 
both internally and externally due to open traces. Microsection analysis
of 
several of the failing PCBs found barrel cracks, plating folds, and
insufficient 
wall thickness.

Our fabrication specification requires "Copper Plating, Annular Ring,
Conductor 
Spacing, and Solder Mask requirements shall be in accordance with
IPC-6012, 
Class 3". PCB is 6 layers or IPC Type 3.

I applied IPC-6012 tables 4-2 Sampling Plan and 4-3 Acceptance Testing
and 
Frequency to give the following:

- Table 4-3 specifies sample frequencies of 2.5 for Plating / Coating
Thickness 
and 0.1 for Hole Plating Thickness (structural integrity after stress),
both per 
panel.

- Our lot size was approximately 2000 PCBs, yield is 6 PCBs from an 18"
x 24" 
fabrication panel, therefore at least 330 fabrication panels would have
been 
processed.

- From Table 4-2, my assumption is that lot size should be 330 panels,
and 
the corresponding sample sizes for 0.1 is 125 and 2.5 is 16 (please
correct me 
if I'm interpreting this incorrectly !).

Some questions: 

1. What governs how the fabricator applies the specification to their
process. 
In other words, does a vendor have freedom to perform (in our case) 125 
samples / 16 samples from a single fabrication panel and then pass the
other 
329 based upon those results, or is there some other specification which

which the vendor must follow for sample identification ?
2. If so, how do I properly convey this to the vendor ?

We have since determined the cause was 1 of 7 sub lots at our vendor was

improperly processed through desmear. It's my feeling that our Class 3 
requirement should have caught the failures at the fabricator if proper 
sampling / testing was performed - comments ?

Thanks,
Dave

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------
This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2