TECHNET Archives

July 2008

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Igoshev, Vladimir" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Igoshev, Vladimir
Date:
Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:47:17 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (233 lines)
Good luck with that. I'd also advise you to do X-section after every
stage.

Regards,

Vladimir

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Kane, Amol (349)
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 3:37 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] FW: [LF] [TN] SN100 for Reflow Application

Thank you for the continued interest in this thread! I am getting lots
of useful information.

As things stand right now, we plan to attach strain gauges to the board
post SMT and measure the stress during secondary operations (stuffing TH
parts, locating the board in a wave pallet, wave, de-panel and ICT) to
get a clue of where the fractures might be occurring.

Regards,
Amol

P.S: Apologies for the export control paragraph that appears after the
E-Mail. it is controlled and added automatically by out IT department on
all outgoing messages by default and I have no way of deleting it.


-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Igoshev, Vladimir
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 3:27 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] FW: [LF] [TN] SN100 for Reflow Application

Other very interesting and almost overlooked things to know (data to
have) would be the fracture toughness for fracture nucleation and
propagation, as well as how and where an initial microcrack gets formed
in the first place.

I wish I had funds for it :-)

Vladimir

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Stadem, Richard D.
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 1:52 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] FW: [LF] [TN] SN100 for Reflow Application

Thank you, Werner.
All is as I expected. The data probably does not exist.

I wholeheartedly endorse your suggestions, that these "families of
stress-strain curves for various T's and strain rates for Sn37Pb, SAC305
and SN100C and their creep rates be determined, at least on a
comparative basis between SAC305 and SN100C".

I agree this would be helpful in understanding the stresses potential
impact on these alloys. Good project for the solder companies to work
on.

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Werner Engelmaier /*
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 11:59 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] FW: [LF] [TN] SN100 for Reflow Application

Hi Dean,
You asked the following-post-facing with "I am not a metallurgist, and I
am at a loss as to where to find this information."-unfortunately, there
is no easy way to find the information, and some of it may not as yet
exist.

> 1. Does the elimination of such a small amount of silver from the
> alloy contribute to any significant increase in the solder's ductility

> after soldering is completed?
> A: It is not so much the reduction of the Ag-content (which by the way

> on a
general basis leads to reduced creep-fatigue lives under ATC), but the
addition of Ni and Ge that changes the metallurgical structure of the
alloy. While Keith states that SN100C has better ductility than SAC305,
I have not seen any data, and ductility is not as important as is the
modulus of elasticity (stiffness).
>
> 2.Specifically, can you provide data as to exactly what the ductility
> delta is between all three alloys? I would expect a significant
> difference between 63/37 and SN100 or SAC305, due to the percentage of

> lead.
> A: See above.
>
> 3. Also, with the understanding that VPS would probably provide better

> wetting, how would it otherwise affect the ductility of the alloy
> after soldering is completed? The profile used is essentially the
same.
> A: Typically it is the resulting grain structure that determines
> properties,
so it is not whether you use VPS or something else, but the cooling
rate.
However, please note that the grain structure of solders is unstable and
will coarsen over time, temperature and stress-level enhanced.
>
> 4. For a given assembly that has inherently high CTE stresses due to
> design issues as Amol's assembly presumably has, are you saying that
> using SN100 and VPS rather than SAC305 and convection reflow will cure

> his problems?
> A: Cannot be determined a priori.
>
> 5. How do the long-term creep fatigue rates of Sn100 compare with
> SAC305 and SN63Pb37?
> A: I have not seen data as yet.
>
>
> Werner Engelmaier
Future workshops:
Solder Joint Reliability: Parts 1 through 4, July 17/18, Thal,
Switzerland Pb-Free Soldering Processes-Survival, Quality, Reliability,
August 18, Orlando Reliability Issues with Lead-Free Soldering
Processes, September 22, Schaumburg Failure Mode and Root Cause Analyses
Reliability (Fatigue, Brittle Fracture, ENIG), September 22, Schaumburg
Solder Joint Reliability: Parts 1 & 4, Oct. 9, Moscow, Russia Solder
Joint Reliability: Parts 1 & 4, Oct. 22, Tallinn, Estonia



**************
Get the scoop on last night's hottest shows and the live music scene in
your area - Check out TourTracker.com!

(http://www.tourtracker.com?NCID=aolmus00050000000112)

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET
Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the
posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the
archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please
visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for
additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------



WARNING:  Export Control 
This document may contain technical data within the definition of the 
International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), and subject to the
Export 
Control Laws of the U.S. Government.  Transfer of such data by any means
to a 
foreign person, whether in the United States or abroad, without proper
export 
authorization or other approval from the U.S. Department of State is 
prohibited. 
 
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: 
This e-mail, and any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended 
recipient(s) and may contain information that is confidential and 
protected from disclosure under the law. Any unauthorized review, use, 
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended 
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail, and delete/destroy

all copies of the original message and attachments. 
Thank you.

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2