Although the correspondence under this title has been very interesting and
informative this string drifted somewhat from the original question, which was:
From: "Kane, Amol (349)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: SN100 for Reflow Application
X-To: TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>,
Dear technetters,
Is anybody using SN100 (or other high Sn alloys) for SMT reflow soldering
applications? what have your experiences been with this alloy?
I have a PCB with a BGA, that is cracking due to mechanical stress (that is
not SMT process related), we have a combination of solder cracking, and pad
cratering. The PCB currently uses SAC305. We also build a SnPb variant of the
same exact board with no issues (the bare board material is different for SnPb
and LF versions). I was therefore wondering whether SCA305 alloy properties
could be a contributing factor this defect. How does the ductility and shear
strength of SN100C compare to SAC305 and 67-37SNPb alloy?
To return to the original question, since it has not been clear from the
correspondence exactly what the nature of the crack was I cannot say with any
certainty whether the result would be any better with SN100C than with SAC305.
However, to answer the specific question on the ductility and shear strength of
SN100C, it is a more ductile alloy than SAC305 and has a lower flow stress
and in that regard is more like 63/37 SnPb. If the cracking occurred in a
situation where the joint was subjected to substantial strain then the greater
compliance of the SN100C could mean that the solder would accommodate that strain
without cracking and without transmitting the stress to the substrate or the
component. Cratering can be a symptom of unrelieved stress being transmitted
into the laminate instead of being absorbed by deformation of the solder
itself, e.g. the cratering failure with area array devices in dropped cell phones
with SAC305 joints. Cracking of chip capacitors can be another consequence of
strain being transmitted rather than accommodated by the solder.
In regard to a later comment on the poor results obtained in reflow with the
99C alloy (Sn-0.7Cu), although SN100C is based on that same alloy
microalloying with Ni and Ge substantially changes the behaviour of the alloy, as has been
well documented in several peer-reviewed scientific papers. Reflowed SN100C
joints are smooth, bright and generally free of shrinkage defects and can be
difficult to distinguish from 63/37SnPb joints.
The higher melting point of SN100C (227C/440F compared with the
215-220C/419-428F of SAC305) has been raised as a concern but the experience of the
increasing number of lines running with SN100C paste indicates that because of the
modifying effect of the microalloying additions the alloy needs less superheat
(excess of the peak temperature over the melting point) than SAC305. For
reflow lines reflowing SAC305 with a peak temperature around 240-245C/464-473F,
which seems to be a profile very commonly used with that alloy, SN100C has
proved to a "drop-in-replacement". However, depending on the Delta T, we would be
more cautious about suggesting SN100C would be a drop-in-replacement for
SAC305 for lines running with a peak temperature 230-235C/446-455F. However,
results obtained with the new generation of vapour phase reflow systems indicate
that good results can be achieved with SN100C with a liquid with a boiling
point of 235C/455F.
Keith Sweatman
Nihon Superior Co., Ltd
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree
To temporarily stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks send: SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|