TECHNET Archives

June 2008

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ahne Oosterhof <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Thu, 5 Jun 2008 08:10:30 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (69 lines)
The washing process sloshes dirt all over the board and if the process is
really good, the dirt goes down the drain.
The smaller the spaces under the components, the harder it is to remove the
dirt there and the easier it is for the dirt to collect there.
If you are dealing with high voltages do not rely on the solder mask for
insulation; therefore no runs under components.
Solutions: make sure you have a very good and well controlled washing
process.
If you have high voltages across short distances you have high fields and
that is where the dirt collects and where the dendrites will grow.    
If the high voltage is across an SMT resistor, you can mitigate the problem
by placing two resistors in series. For caps, use a bigger body part.

Have fun,
Ahne 

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Phil Nutting
Sent: Wednesday, 04 June, 2008 09:34
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Removing soldermask under SMT devices

As we do more SMT boards with high power or high voltage we have seen some
failures we suspect are due to flux and other undesirable junk under some
SMT devices.  In researching cleaning processes (and failures) I have seen
some articles that show "our fault mode".  One solution seen in this
research suggests removing solder mask under SMT components to give a larger
space under the parts to allow the junk to be more easily removed during the
cleaning process.

Is this an industry problem and is removing the silkscreen under the devices
an industry solution?  If removing the silkscreen is what folks are doing,
what are the decision criteria being used as to which components get this
treatment?  Is it every component or just those that have the highest
likelihood of failure due to the current through or voltage across the part?

Thanks in advance.

Phil Nutting

Note: All the information contained in this e-mail and its attachments is
proprietary to Kaiser Systems, Inc. and it may not be reproduced without the
prior written permission of sender.  If you have received this email in
error, please immediately return it to sender and delete the copy you
received.

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the
BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet
NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send
e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the archives of
previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please visit IPC web
site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2