TECHNET Archives

June 2008

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Maxwell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, John Maxwell <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 4 Jun 2008 11:51:30 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (101 lines)
Lenny,
There is a couple of papers that another fellow and I wrote looking at 
high voltage degradation based on flux type and solder alloy followed by 
a paper on pad design for high voltage capacitors and results. Humidity 
was the driver for degradation. The papers were presented at CARTS 
(Capacitor and Resistor Symposium) and are available on the Johanson 
Dielectrics web site www.johansondielectrics.com.

John Maxwell


> Phil, what kind of voltages are you seeing problems with?  we design 
> inverters for LCD backlighting and are familiar with voltages up to 
> about 3500vAC.  We dont remove ANY mask under components.  Our typical 
> failure is often related to HV spacing requirements of conductive 
> materials.  We often have to conformally coat component pads, 
> component bodies, etc... and to avoid voltage creepage along pcb 
> surfaces we add slots cut into the pcb. The air is harder to arc 
> across instead of the pcb surface.  We also sometimes ADD silkscreen 
> over HV traces for arc suppression, NOT remove it. You mention current 
> and voltage in your last sentence.  Again this is for high VOLTAGES 
> only.  for higher current we simply make thicker copper or wider 
> traces, or both.
> Lenny ERG  www.ergpower.com
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Phil Nutting" 
> <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 12:33 PM
> Subject: [TN] Removing soldermask under SMT devices
>
>
> As we do more SMT boards with high power or high voltage we have seen 
> some failures we suspect are due to flux and other undesirable junk 
> under some SMT devices.  In researching cleaning processes (and 
> failures) I have seen some articles that show "our fault mode".  One 
> solution seen in this research suggests removing solder mask under SMT 
> components to give a larger space under the parts to allow the junk to 
> be more easily removed during the cleaning process.
>
> Is this an industry problem and is removing the silkscreen under the 
> devices an industry solution?  If removing the silkscreen is what 
> folks are doing, what are the decision criteria being used as to which 
> components get this treatment?  Is it every component or just those 
> that have the highest likelihood of failure due to the current through 
> or voltage across the part?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Phil Nutting
>
> Note: All the information contained in this e-mail and its attachments 
> is proprietary to Kaiser Systems, Inc. and it may not be reproduced 
> without the prior written permission of sender.  If you have received 
> this email in error, please immediately return it to sender and delete 
> the copy you received.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to 
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to 
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> Search the archives of previous posts at: 
> http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> Please visit IPC web site 
> http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional 
> information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 
> 847-615-7100 ext.2815
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to 
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to 
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> Search the archives of previous posts at: 
> http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> Please visit IPC web site 
> http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional 
> information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 
> 847-615-7100 ext.2815
> -----------------------------------------------------
>

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2