TECHNET Archives

June 2008

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Lenny Carter <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Wed, 4 Jun 2008 14:02:52 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (69 lines)
Phil, what kind of voltages are you seeing problems with?  we design 
inverters for LCD backlighting and are familiar with voltages up to about 
3500vAC.  We dont remove ANY mask under components.  Our typical failure is 
often related to HV spacing requirements of conductive materials.  We often 
have to conformally coat component pads, component bodies, etc... and to 
avoid voltage creepage along pcb surfaces we add slots cut into the pcb. 
The air is harder to arc across instead of the pcb surface.  We also 
sometimes ADD silkscreen over HV traces for arc suppression, NOT remove it. 
You mention current and voltage in your last sentence.  Again this is for 
high VOLTAGES only.  for higher current we simply make thicker copper or 
wider traces, or both.
Lenny ERG  www.ergpower.com


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Phil Nutting" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 12:33 PM
Subject: [TN] Removing soldermask under SMT devices


As we do more SMT boards with high power or high voltage we have seen some 
failures we suspect are due to flux and other undesirable junk under some 
SMT devices.  In researching cleaning processes (and failures) I have seen 
some articles that show "our fault mode".  One solution seen in this 
research suggests removing solder mask under SMT components to give a larger 
space under the parts to allow the junk to be more easily removed during the 
cleaning process.

Is this an industry problem and is removing the silkscreen under the devices 
an industry solution?  If removing the silkscreen is what folks are doing, 
what are the decision criteria being used as to which components get this 
treatment?  Is it every component or just those that have the highest 
likelihood of failure due to the current through or voltage across the part?

Thanks in advance.

Phil Nutting

Note: All the information contained in this e-mail and its attachments is 
proprietary to Kaiser Systems, Inc. and it may not be reproduced without the 
prior written permission of sender.  If you have received this email in 
error, please immediately return it to sender and delete the copy you 
received.

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to 
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to 
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2