Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 4 Jun 2008 14:02:52 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Phil, what kind of voltages are you seeing problems with? we design
inverters for LCD backlighting and are familiar with voltages up to about
3500vAC. We dont remove ANY mask under components. Our typical failure is
often related to HV spacing requirements of conductive materials. We often
have to conformally coat component pads, component bodies, etc... and to
avoid voltage creepage along pcb surfaces we add slots cut into the pcb.
The air is harder to arc across instead of the pcb surface. We also
sometimes ADD silkscreen over HV traces for arc suppression, NOT remove it.
You mention current and voltage in your last sentence. Again this is for
high VOLTAGES only. for higher current we simply make thicker copper or
wider traces, or both.
Lenny ERG www.ergpower.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Phil Nutting" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 12:33 PM
Subject: [TN] Removing soldermask under SMT devices
As we do more SMT boards with high power or high voltage we have seen some
failures we suspect are due to flux and other undesirable junk under some
SMT devices. In researching cleaning processes (and failures) I have seen
some articles that show "our fault mode". One solution seen in this
research suggests removing solder mask under SMT components to give a larger
space under the parts to allow the junk to be more easily removed during the
cleaning process.
Is this an industry problem and is removing the silkscreen under the devices
an industry solution? If removing the silkscreen is what folks are doing,
what are the decision criteria being used as to which components get this
treatment? Is it every component or just those that have the highest
likelihood of failure due to the current through or voltage across the part?
Thanks in advance.
Phil Nutting
Note: All the information contained in this e-mail and its attachments is
proprietary to Kaiser Systems, Inc. and it may not be reproduced without the
prior written permission of sender. If you have received this email in
error, please immediately return it to sender and delete the copy you
received.
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
|
|
|