TECHNET Archives

June 2008

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Stadem, Richard D." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Stadem, Richard D.
Date:
Tue, 3 Jun 2008 07:49:41 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (69 lines)
I wholeheartedly agree with Rudy's comments.
I have several patents, and have won awards at the last two companies
where I worked for intellectual property development. However, many of
the companies I currently work for as a consulting engineer no longer
wish to patent their technical developments, as they find they seldom
get to sell the license to use. Instead what happens is that they
release the patent only to see the new technology quickly stolen and put
to use by China and other countries that abuse patent rights the same
way they do human rights. The same happens with large companies that
have the dollars to fend off a patent lawsuit. Not to sound like a
pessimistic American, but a much more pragmatic approach is to
completely document the process or product and hide it from the light of
day, and/or patent it under a completely different title or technology
description.
Pragmatically speaking, patents are only an expensive method of
advertising for the company or the inventor. There is no value in
patenting for protection; the opposite is usually the result. All of
this coincidentially began to happen in the 1950s, when American
technology took off in leaps and bounds ahead of the rest of the world.

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of R Sedlak
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 5:08 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] [NTC] An unfortunate sign of things to come...

There is an important difference between "inventions" and patents.

Patents may have slowed, but it does not mean that "inventions" have
slowed.

My company has virtually suspended patenting ideas because patents are
currently virtually unenforceable in many parts of the world, and serve
really as road maps on how to steal technology.

When we do patent, the examples given in the patent will never actually
work in the commercial world.

Rudy Sedlak
RD Chemical Company




      

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET
Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the
posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the
archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please
visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for
additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2