TECHNET Archives

May 2008

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 20 May 2008 13:27:46 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (106 lines)
Leif,
Wow interesting problem.
- 10% defect
- standard finish
- Active water wash solder paste
- new prob on old board
- placement good
- lead free process OK
- lot code specific? Undetermined.

- Try printing paste on bare laminate or glass, placing components and
running at hotter and hotter temperatures to see if there is a
difference.  - Perhaps you can just run a slightly hotter leaded
profile.
- Sounds like you are already using a fairly active flux in your solder
paste.
- Running a different make of caps sounds good.
- Any change to that board design where you now have a massive internal
ground plane hooked to one of the tow pads of the caps in question?

Let us know how it turns out.

Bev
RIM

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Leif Erik Laerum
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 1:05 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] 0402 capacitors turning

Technetters,

I am new to this group, but I have scanned the archives and there seems 
to a lot of expertise available, so I thought I bring up an issue we are

battling with  that I was hoping getting some suggested remedies for.

We have an issue where 0402 Capacitors are turning during reflow. They 
are basically clocking beyond the 50% pad coverage rule. We can have as 
much as 10% of the caps on one board do this. These are lead free caps 
with matte tin termination. The vendor is of course claiming that it is 
compatible with eutectic solder and a leaded process. We are using 
Sn63Pb37 water soluble solder with an RTS profile.

The boards in question have been built for a while and this is a new 
problem. The placement is perfect. The problem does not appear when we 
use this same cap on our lead free assemblies.

Within a batch of, say 50 boards, the issue seem to vary with each reel 
different. We have not narrowed it down to a specific date code yet, but

that experiment is next. These are all from the same vendor so we are 
also planning to try a different vendors capacitors.

One idea I had was that there is some sort of out gassing that move 
these caps, but we do not see any blow holes. I am not observing any 
other obvious defects and the issue is exclusive to these caps.. The 
easy answer is of course to go to a lead free assembly, but that is not 
really an option at this point.

Could oxidized caps on the caps cause this. Would using a different 
solder with an more aggressive flux be an idea? I have also thought of  
reducing the aperture in the stencil to reduce the solder. 

Any input would be highly appreciated.

-- 
Leif Erik Laerum
Quality Assurance Manager
Texas Memory Systems
[log in to unmask]
Tel: (713) 266-3200 x468
www.texmemsys.com


---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------
This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2