TECHNET Archives

May 2008

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Leif Erik Laerum <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Leif Erik Laerum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 20 May 2008 12:05:17 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (53 lines)
Technetters,

I am new to this group, but I have scanned the archives and there seems 
to a lot of expertise available, so I thought I bring up an issue we are 
battling with  that I was hoping getting some suggested remedies for.

We have an issue where 0402 Capacitors are turning during reflow. They 
are basically clocking beyond the 50% pad coverage rule. We can have as 
much as 10% of the caps on one board do this. These are lead free caps 
with matte tin termination. The vendor is of course claiming that it is 
compatible with eutectic solder and a leaded process. We are using 
Sn63Pb37 water soluble solder with an RTS profile.

The boards in question have been built for a while and this is a new 
problem. The placement is perfect. The problem does not appear when we 
use this same cap on our lead free assemblies.

Within a batch of, say 50 boards, the issue seem to vary with each reel 
different. We have not narrowed it down to a specific date code yet, but 
that experiment is next. These are all from the same vendor so we are 
also planning to try a different vendors capacitors.

One idea I had was that there is some sort of out gassing that move 
these caps, but we do not see any blow holes. I am not observing any 
other obvious defects and the issue is exclusive to these caps.. The 
easy answer is of course to go to a lead free assembly, but that is not 
really an option at this point.

Could oxidized caps on the caps cause this. Would using a different 
solder with an more aggressive flux be an idea? I have also thought of  
reducing the aperture in the stencil to reduce the solder. 

Any input would be highly appreciated.

-- 
Leif Erik Laerum
Quality Assurance Manager
Texas Memory Systems
[log in to unmask]
Tel: (713) 266-3200 x468
www.texmemsys.com


---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2