TECHNET Archives

April 2008

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"David D. Hillman" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Fri, 11 Apr 2008 07:14:37 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (84 lines)
Hi Wayne! Ah, if it were only that easy! A QFN component essentially is a 
"blind solder joint" so you must rely on your process to produce an 
acceptable solder joint and confirm that process consistency through 
testing. We are faced with a variety of component styles now, such a 
bottom only terminated devices, where there is no visible solder joint 
available for inspection. Using a combination of process validation, Xray 
inspection techniques and product integrity testing, you should be able to 
confirm the solder joint integrity. A very common industry myth is that we 
"inspect" quality into our electronic assemblies - the reality is that the 
inspection step is only a confirmation that your design and assembly 
processes are controlled/consistent. The JSTD-001 and IPC-610 
specifications attempt to provide as much assistance as possible. Good 
Luck.

Dave Hillman
Rockwell Collins
[log in to unmask]



Wayne Thayer <[log in to unmask]> 
Sent by: TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
04/10/2008 09:35 PM
Please respond to
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>; Please respond to
Wayne Thayer <[log in to unmask]>


To
[log in to unmask]
cc

Subject
[TN] FN Parts--Evidence of Wetting






Relevant IPC specs claim that no toe fillet is required for DFN/QFN parts 
and 
there is no minimum solder joint height.  The only requirement for the 
joint 
other than alignment/pad size is "evidence of wetting".  How do I get this 

evidence without a toe fillet?  I suppose if I have enough joint height I 
can 
see under the part like a BGA, but I've never seen a FN part mounted that 
high.

Would be nice if the spec included some pix/examples of this "evidence".

Any recommendations would be very much appreciated.

Thanks,

Wayne Thayer

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to 
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to 
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------


---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2