Hi,I have been asked to consider the up-issue of SMT, reflow and stencil 
print programs using an engineering change process with respect to 
controlling changes made and for products being manufactured to AS9100 
specifications.
 
Has anyone had any experience of this practice? What is the general opinion 
of trying to control SMT program issue status (not assembly issue but SMT/reflow
program issue) using an engineering change.  Is this common practice.
 
When changes are made to the SMT, reflow or stencil print, program there would 
need to be an EC to approve the change.  I am a bit unsure if this is workable!! Thanks for the input in advance.Douglas I McCall.
_________________________________________________________________
Win 100’s of Virgin Experience days with BigSnapSearch.com
http://www.bigsnapsearch.com
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------