TECHNET Archives

March 2008

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mike Sewell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Mike Sewell <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 11:07:32 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (99 lines)
Component mix is another issue, Freescale, for example, in their LGA
application notes has a target solder volume of 7000 mil^3 and a min of
4800 mil^3.  Trying to get to the min with a typical 6 mil stencil would
mean overprinting the pad somewhat @ their recommended pad diameter.  A
thicker stencil may not be an option depending on the pitch/size of
other parts on the assembly. 

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Stadem, Richard D.
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 9:23 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] LGA Reliability

Actually, I am in agreement with Werner on LGAs. It is another one of
those "it depends" issues.
Larger LGAs with arrayed terminations on the bottom of the package are
susceptible to process constraints such as the amount of solder
deposited on the pads. If you can print enough solder volume to
essentially replace the missing solder balls, then you improve the
reliability. Even if you use a standard 6 mil thick stencil you end up
with very flat solder joints that have very little compliancy to take up
the difference in the CTE between the LGA package and the PWB. If the
pads on the PWB are .030" diameter or larger, I have noticed that the
number of extraneous solder balls under the LGA begins to increase when
you are trying to get enough solder under the part.

On the smaller types of LGAs with only bottom terminations on the
periphery, the problems I have been seeing is trying to keep all of the
solder bricks uniform enough so that when they go into reflow all of the
terminations are wetted. Sometimes one or two of the pads have a little
bit less solder, and no physical contact is made between these shorter
bricks and the LGA pads, because all of the rest of the bricks are
holding the part up. 

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Werner Engelmaier /*
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 8:20 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] LGA Reliability

Hi Phil,
The devil is in the details-however, 2-to-2.5mils standoffs =
2-to-2.5mils solder joint height are of concern even with small
delta-CTEs [I am not even going near the cleaning issues].
With large thermal slugs, these packages may also be thermally
non-symmetric, which means that they warp out-of-plane both during
soldering operations and operation with any kind of power dissipation.
Ask them if their "reliability claims" are based on IPC-9701 testing.

Werner



**************
Create a Home Theater Like the Pros. Watch the video on AOL Home.
      
(http://home.aol.com/diy/home-improvement-eric-stromer?video=15?ncid=aol
hom00030000000001)

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET
Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the
posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the
archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please
visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for
additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2