Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:50:46 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Werenr,
May I be able to know your general opinion about this type of packages by any chance?
Specially if your possible point of view about the defects over the temperature range may encounter during reflow process.
From where I am seeing it is going to be less component or PCB warpage due to the CTE and stiffness mismatch.
But from the other hand I am not sure how the PCB by itself would handle the thermal cycling. Delamination, kinking, buckling due to the tension/compression and shear at the interfaces.
Any advice?
Thanks,
Al
[log in to unmask] wrote: Hi Al,
Indeed it would have to conform to the 9701 mandated requirements, mainly thickness.
On the other hand, 9701 allows deviations of the mandated requirements as long as they are fully documented.
Werner
**************
It's Tax Time! Get tips, forms, and advice on AOL Money & Finance.
(http://money.aol.com/tax?NCID=aolprf00030000000001)
---------------------------------
Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
|
|
|