TECHNET Archives

February 2008

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 29 Feb 2008 09:07:11 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (605 lines)
No, we use a semiautomatic machine  from ERNI/Germany.

Inge 

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Neifer, Gebhard
Sent: den 29 februari 2008 07:48
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] AW: [TN] SV: [TN] SV: [TN] Do it yourself Occam assembly


Inge, can you please share which insertion machine you are referring to? I am aware of the Eberhard and Tyco/AMP systems that are quite fast. Have you bought one of these lately or is there another player I look into?

 

Thanks in advance, cheers,

Gebhard

 

 

_________________________________________________________   

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] Im Auftrag von Hfjord
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. Februar 2008 19:30
An: [log in to unmask]
Betreff: [TN] SV: [TN] SV: [TN] Do it yourself Occam assembly

 

Joe, I'm surprised, that nobody added a solderless technology that is

widespread and used already. PRESSFIT !!!  We have bought a machine that 

Inserts 600 pin connectors in just seconds. I'm in a group that makes some 

studies in future assembly technologies. We predict, that there will come

some sort of platforms very like BGAs, but with pressfit instead of solder

balls. Furthermore, we expect there will also come a micropressfit

technology for semi packages, inductors, caps, potentiometers etc. The

disadvantage with a all-pressfit board will be the assembly speed. A

Ericsson mobile telephone board is typically chip shooter mounted in 30

seconds and soldered in a couple of minutes. Pressfit will probably never be

that fast...

 

Inge

 

 

 

 

-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----

Från: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] För Joe Fjelstad

Skickat: den 26 februari 2008 23:04

Till: [log in to unmask]

Ämne: Re: [TN] SV: [TN] Do it yourself Occam assembly

 

Thanks Inge

 

 

 

Yours is exactly the kind of thinking that is required to get us beyond the

problems our poor beleaguered industry faces.

 

 

 

All of what you list are certainly candidates for inclusion in a future

world of solderless assembly. I trust that you have sparked some new

thinking here as well. 

 

 

 

Best regards and wishes, 

 

Joe 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----

From: Hfjord <[log in to unmask]>

To: 'TechNet E-Mail Forum' <[log in to unmask]>; [log in to unmask]

Sent: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 11:59 am

Subject: SV: [TN] Do it yourself Occam assembly

 

 

 

Joe, you should change name to Joy ! And found the company 'JoyToys', if not

lready established.

Right you are

anish will soldering

ome will else

Yoda)

But I don't think all soldering will be superseded by alternative methods. 

Solderfree connecting has indeed existed for decades:

Thickfilm hybrids with conductive adhesives, as you pointed out.

Trillions of semi chips have been scrubbed to the header.

YAG laser spot welded components

Vacuum metal deposition

Plasma metallization

Plating technologies

Chemical metal joining

Electron beam spot welding

Beamlead welding 

Amalgam technologies 

Electric discharge welding

Friction welding

Wire bonding

Gold stud bumping 

Ultrasonic technologies

Etc.

Who knows, maybe one of these technologies will be developed for mass

roduction of boards, or rather something that reminds of today's boards.

/Inge

-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----

rån: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] För Joe Fjelstad

kickat: den 26 februari 2008 18:49

ill: [log in to unmask]

mne: [TN] Do it yourself Occam assembly

Greetings  folks, 

 have tried  to sidestep most of the controversy associated with Occam and

solderless assembly as much as possible to focus on getting projects  done.

However some controversy is, I suppose, good as it keeps  interest alive. As

Yogi Berra might have noted: "If it wasn't  controversial, everybody would

ot 

top to avoid talking about it"...  ;-) 

o I thought  it might be worth while to give everyone here a way to make 

heir own Occam type  assemblies using legacy through hole components at

heir 

esk in a matter of minutes. This will allow folks to form  their own

pinions 

s to the fundamental viability of the concept for the  future.   

his is  only for demonstration purposes but I trust it will open some

inds 

o the possibilities that exist in the fundamental concept. The following  

ill work for one or more metal layers but designs should be kept simple

or 

ractical reasons.  

)   Obtain a piece of  corregated  cardboard box  (Option: draw your

ircuit 

ayout on the  surface) 

)   Tape a piece of clear polyethylene (a  half a common sandwich bag will 

o) to the  cardboard 

)    Place a second larger piece of card  board underneath to keep the desk

or other surface  clean 

)    Clip the leads down slightly  (one can intuit for themselves how much 

o clip off)   

)    Push the leads through the  polyethylene into the card board at (the 

olyethylene should seal the leads  reasonably well but there might be some 

mall leakage to the card board) Pin  holes might be required as starters

or many 

eaded devices. Shorter clipped  leads will be easier. 

)    Cut a hole in another piece of  cardboard that will encompass the 

omponents and provide a resin dam  wrap polyethylene around the exposed

dges  

this step is  optional depending on size of the assemlby) 

)    Mix up some 5 minute epoxy and  pour over components (try not to get 

oo many bubbles  entrained) 

)    Remove the assembly and trim the  leads as necessary 

)    Using a silver ink pen (available  from some circuit equipment 

roviders) draw your interconnections  between contacts 

0)  If  cross overs are required, use some nail polish at the

ntersection. 

It can be used for  cover coating if desired.  

1) Attach  battery and go have some fun. :-)  

otes. 1)  If you want to include connectors, have  the mated portions in 

hem in case some wicking occurs.   

) Small batteries (or screw top battery holders) can be embedded if  

esired.  

) Dome switches are a low profile choice. 

) A piece of 100 mil center "bread board" without plated through  holes can

be used in place of the cardboard for greater placement  accuracy if that is

of interest. 

) The  process will work for SMT devices as well but the devices need to be

kept  flat and a sanding step will likely be required to clean off resin

rom 

ontact surfaces.  

)  The conductivity of silver ink is about 10% of copper so stay away from

high power designs. (keep it simple)      

his is  obviously not a production technology but it does provide a  simple

demonstration. I sent Steve Gregory a photo of a simple  assembly for those 

nterested to view what such a simple assembly looks like and  he has kindly

consented to post it. Here is the  link: 

ttp://stevezeva.homestead.com/files/Through_hole_Occam_prototype.jpg .   

t  could also serve the needs of some hobbyists and could be a fun project 

or  anyone having children interested in electronics. 

hile I  appreciate the skepticism of those who question the potential of  

olderless assembly, including many long time friends whom I respect and

old  

ear. I trust that there will be some increase in acceptance  of the concept

with the data that we are in the process of  generating.     

t may  well be that the final versions of Occam assemblies will not look 

ery  much like today's assemblies. They could well appear to look more like

metal jacketed bricks with interconnections on the surfaces to which other  

ssembly elements (keyboards, displays, etc.) can be joined using other

olderless 

echniques such low profile connectors or conductive and/or  anisotropic 

onductive adhesives.  

he brick  like structure should also prove great for product design 

ecurity.  Remember when Apple announced the I-Phone last year?  3 days

ater there  

as a public tear down of the product design an everyone could see what was

going on. It will be much more difficult with the solderless brick

pproach.   

ortunately, wholesale change within the industry  is not required for the 

rocess as identified. The equipment, materials and  chemistry exist for

very 

rocess required.  More importantly,  there are some new materials and 

rocesses on the horizon that appear extremely  well suited to the

olderless 

pproach. 

nother point  that needs to be addressed related to the process

nvironment. 

 number of  folks have registered alarm or at least concern at the thought 

f having plating  equipment under the same roof as pick and place equipment

(or vise  versa). To allay such concerns, one need only go to just about any

CB 

hop  in the world to see precision equipment (drills, lasers and imaging  

quipment) under one roof with a plating shop. The process areas are

hysically 

nd environmentally separated of course. The PCB industry has  operated in 

uch a fashion since the 1960s. 

hanging topics, I found the  following quote from a Test and Measurement 

orld article from  October of last year. 

ttp://www.tmworld.com/article/CA6482921.html 

In 1999,  Stig Oresjo, then of Agilent Technologies, conducted a major

tudy 

f  solder-joint defects on printed-circuit boards (PCBs). The study, which 

t the  time provided the most definitive data on the subject, involved 15 

ompanies and  more than 1 billion solder joints. Oresjo concluded  that

lthough 

ompanies claimed defect levels in the range of 75 to 150 defects  per

illion 

pportunities (DPMO), the reality was 5 to 10 times that high."   

n Oresjo's original study, he found the  following defect distribution: 

)         41% Solder Opens   

 )        20% Shorts   

 )        20% Solder Quality   

 )         8% Placement   

 )         8% Electrical   

)          3% Other  

t  appears that almost 80% of the problems are related to soldering (90% if

the 8%  for placement is included but I am sure it is much better these

ays.) 

he  8% electrical problems cited are, I assume, parts related problems of  

nspecified cause.  

hile  on the subject of electrical failures, does anyone here have any data

on  how many components are damaged by the temperatures associated with the

soldering process? Also how many of the electrical failures might have been

caused by poor cleaning? I have heard a lot of anecdotal information but no

hard facts. I guess I am wondering, has there been an identified  and

easured 

ffect of the lead-free assembly on first  pass product assembly yield

ompared 

o tin-lead solder?   

 would  prefer an open forum answer to these questions but I realize that 

here might be  some discomfort so if anyone prefers to respond off line,

hat 

s  fine.  Thanks in advance for any input on the  topic. 

est wishes  to all and have some fun with the table top solderless  

ssembly...  

oe  

 

**************Ideas to please picky eaters. Watch video on AOL Living.      

http://living.aol.com/video/how-to-please-your-picky-eater/rachel-campos-du

fy/

050827?NCID=aolcmp00300000002598)

---------------------------------------------------

echnet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0

o unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in

he BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet

o temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to

[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)

o receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to

[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest

earch the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives

lease visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16

or additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or

47-615-7100 ext.2815

----------------------------------------------------

 

 

---------------------------------------------------

Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0

To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in

the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet

To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to

[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)

To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to

[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest

Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives

Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16

for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or

847-615-7100 ext.2815

-----------------------------------------------------

 

---------------------------------------------------

Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0

To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in

the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet

To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)

To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest

Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives

Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815

-----------------------------------------------------



****************************************************************************************

Note:  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you. 

****************************************************************************************

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2