Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | (Leadfree Electronics Assembly Forum) |
Date: | Fri, 11 Jan 2008 08:10:20 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Keith,
It's understandable that from your POV, you are approaching whisker risks at a
a board level. Some of those stresses can be induced at assembly, so there
is still some indeterminate level of risk involved. In Richard's case, however,
assembly processes reduce the risk as lead is added to the finished joint.
When we were planning for lead free, I had quite a battle with management to
spend a few more pennies to go with the "safer" (in our applications) ENiG
finishes, with the promise that the industry would respond to pressure to
improve lead free HASL, and whiskerphobia would soon prove itself out one
way or another. So I'm very happy to read your last two posts, knowing that
they will come back to me soon looking for the cost savings.
I'm assuming the SnCuNiGe process is cheaper than ENiG or ImAg, right?
Pete
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree
To temporarily stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks send: SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|