Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 1 Nov 2007 17:00:49 +0200 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
There is a correct amount of flux for every joint. Too much can be worse
than too little. Bigger is not better.
Brian
Ted Tontis wrote:
> Currently we have assemblers who are hand fluxing some TH components at the
> slide line prior to the wave. Some believe that when it comes to hand
> fluxing more is better and flood a whole section of a PCB with flux. My
> concern is that some of the assemblies that have been flooded with flux, on
> the primary side, will have active material left behind after the wave
> process. I know that this is a training issue and I would say that 90% do
> not need to have flux added and with out the flux we get a perfect class 2
> solder joint. I am working on changing the mind set that top flow is
> necessary to be an acceptable class 2 joint.
>
> I have an assembly array that I would like to flood one side with flux and
> leave the other side alone, send it through the wave process and then throw
> it into an environmental chamber. My question is can anyone give me an idea
> on what the best settings would be to get the results I am looking for? I am
> trying to prove or disprove that there is some active agents left on the
> assembly and the pre-heaters are not enough to remove them all. I can not
> use SIR testing because I am looking for specific locations of active
> agents, not an overall level of contamination across the array. Ion
> chromatographs are out of the question due to the cost of testing. I would
> also like to use this as a visual aid when it comes to the retraining of
> assemblers, if it really is an issue.
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
>
>
>
>
> Ted Tontis
>
> Quality Engineer
>
> Borg Indak, Inc.
>
> 701 Enterprise Dr
> Delavan, WI 53115
>
> P 262-245-3060
>
> F 262-728-3788
>
> [log in to unmask]
>
> www.borgindak.com <http://www.borgindak.com/>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
|
|
|