TECHNET Archives

November 2007

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Phillip Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Phillip Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 4 Nov 2007 16:51:12 +0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (164 lines)
I have had to cross section my fair share of underfilled BGAs recently and 
have learned a few things the hard way.

1)  Insufficient:

Visually being able to see a continuous fillet around the four sides of the 
BGA in question is one criteria I can agree with.  This is nondestructive 
and a good criteria.

2)  Excessive:

Inspecting how far the underfill has spread beyond the fillet is another 
important criteria.  Far too often, there is excessive application of 
underfill.

3)  Voids:

Verifying the coverage (which to me is checking for voids) is what I think 
this thread actually was about.  We cross section actual samples and grind 
off the body of the IC which exposes the bird's eye view of the 
underfill.   The criteria is that a void may not connect two balls, however 
it is difficult to see through the material if it is not 100 clear of 
bubbles, and this seems like it is never the case except in lab conditions.

I have heard that SAM works for detecting the voids, but that it takes an 
expert to truly be consistent in detection of these types of voids.

Phil

ps:  I have a related question about going to OSP/Cu finish from ENIG and 
being able to eliminate the underfill requirement altogether.


At 12:21 PM 11/2/2007 -0500, David D. Hillman wrote:
>Hi Tom - Just an correction - the IPC-7095B guideline document and not a
>requirement specification document. The solder voiding requirement of BGAs
>is per JSTD-001. I don't believe that there is an underfill voiding
>requirment in the JSTD-001 specification yet.
>
>Dave Hillman
>Rockwell Collins
>[log in to unmask]
>
>
>
>
>"Gervascio, Thomas" <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent by: TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
>11/02/2007 08:49 AM
>Please respond to
>TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>; Please respond to
>"Gervascio, Thomas" <[log in to unmask]>
>
>
>To
>[log in to unmask]
>cc
>
>Subject
>Re: [TN] verifying BGA underfill coverage
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Curious what criteria are you using for BGA underfill (i.e. voiding,
>coverage, etc). IPC-7095B section 7.2.2?
>
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Joe Macko
>Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 7:34 PM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: [TN] verifying BGA underfill coverage
>
>Fellow Techs
>
>
>
>We purchased a GPD automated epoxy dispenser and I want to proof out the
>new automated underfill application process on BGAs. We use a wickable
>Loctite underfill that requires an elevated temperature to flow properly
>under BGAs, etc..  Currently we successfully underfill by hand and want
>to switch to an automated process using the GPD.
>
>
>
>I want to verify the underfill coverage under BGAs using a
>non-destructive test method. The only non-destructive method I am aware
>of is acoustic imaging using an instrument such as Sonoscan, which I
>believe will show voids in the underfill material. I do not know how
>industry non-destructively verifies underfill coverage.  I plan on
>physically removing some BGAs on scrap boards to verify coverage but do
>not want to do this on good boards for obvious reasons.
>
>
>
>Question - What is the commonly accepted non-destructive method for
>verifying BGA underfill coverage?  Look forward to your comment. thanks
>
>
>
>Best Regards,
>
>- Joe
>
>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------
>Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To
>unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
>the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
>(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET
>Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the
>posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the
>archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please
>visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for
>additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
>847-615-7100 ext.2815
>-----------------------------------------------------
>
>---------------------------------------------------
>Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
>To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
>the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
>To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
>[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
>To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
>[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
>Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
>Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
>for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
>847-615-7100 ext.2815
>-----------------------------------------------------
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------
>Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
>To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
>the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
>To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to 
>[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
>To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to 
>[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
>Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
>Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 
>for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 
>847-615-7100 ext.2815
>-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2