TECHNET Archives

October 2007

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Thu, 4 Oct 2007 13:51:10 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (61 lines)
While working an a CM, other than the one I am presently with, we made
boards for a transmission line (power line) time delay reflectometer. The
end product thumped a down power line and measured the time for a reflection
to return from a break in the line. It was used to locate breaks in the line
over many miles. 
So, there was this huge voltage thump and then a tiny little reflection. 
No-clean flux or poor cleaning rendered the assembly useless.

So, the answer to your question is yes. But, I don't have a number. Brian's
high voltage number may be good, as are the other considerations he
mentioned. 

As for the low side, if a few micro amps of leakage would present an
problem, no-clean will probably be an issue. 

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Phil Nutting
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 11:55 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] operational sweet spot for no-clean flux

Hello Techsperts,

Is there a range in which no-clean is best NOT used?  For example, very low
current circuits or high voltages greater than 110 up to 25 kV?  Our primary
problem seems to be with SMT boards and from more than one vendor. 

I know a lot of companies use no-clean, but for those who insist on washing
boards even those with no-clean flux, what is the reasoning?
Simply esthetics or an actual circuit related requirement?

I'm trying to determine if all our boards must be washed or if there are any
that would be a don't care. 

Thanks in advance,

Phil

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the
BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet
NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send
e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the archives of
previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please visit IPC web
site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2