Would that mean it would be prudent (if not required) to have the 
thermocouples as a calibrated measuring device under the organizations 
calibrations system?

Blair

On Wed, 3 Oct 2007 15:18:10 +0200, Hernefjord Ingemar 
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> 
>My opinion too. As I said in earlier mail: 
>
>"Degradation after 5 cycles is not possible, because the reactions I
>point at are too slow at the low temperature. But, again, 
thermocouples
>degrade slowly..."
>
>Inge
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Guy Ramsey
>Sent: den 3 oktober 2007 15:09
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: [TN] SV: [TN] Thermocouple Longevity?
>
>
>
>While Murphy was an optimist, I maintain that the auditor expecting
>Steve to change thermal couples after five excursions is misinformed.
>

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------