TECHNET Archives

October 2007

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 1 Oct 2007 09:29:24 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (89 lines)
Wayne,

Another factor leading to the failure of the joints is the CB100 via
fill...

The fill does not remain inert under the multiple thermal cycles you are
putting the PCB through...

We do multiple PCBs with vias in pads and have had serious delamination
and joint failures when using PCBs with CB100 fill...

When we had our customer eliminate the CB100 the problems dropped
substantially... Then all you have to do is to develop the profiles to
minimize the trapped air issue.

Paul


Paul Edwards
Process/Quality Engineering
[log in to unmask]
Tel: 408-433-4700
FAX: 408-433-9988
Surface Art Engineering
81Bonaventura Dr.
San Jose, CA 95134
DUNS: 944740570
CAGE/NCAGE: 1XZ48

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Thayer, Wayne
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 6:39 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] BGA Intermetallic failure

0.5 mm pitch BGA, board has via-in-pad.

On 5 of 7 via-in-pad locations, the balls separated in the intermetallic
zone at the substrate interface.  All other balls look ugly, but not out
of the usual ugliness when the BGA is SAC305 and we are attaching with
Sn/Pb, and they seem well attached.  The ugliness of the bulk of the
balls is very uniform, indicating thorough mixing of the alloys.  The
separated intermetallic zone is lumpy gray, not like cases of black pad
I've seen.

Boards had ENIG, then had SnPb SIPAD done on them (requires 2 reflow
cycles).  After that, the BGA's were attached and then the other side
was stenciled, populated, and reflowed.  So the ENIG interface had been
reflowed a total of 4X.

The surface of the via-in-pad locations is fairly lumpy, like is common
with CB100 via fill.  Perhaps this lumpiness was responsible for too
much gold in the joint?  I can't think of any other reason why these
locations are where the problems are.

Additional insight would be very much appreciated.

Thanks,

Wayne Thayer


---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2