TECHNET Archives

October 2007

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jack Olson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Jack Olson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 29 Oct 2007 12:28:17 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
I'm hoping to get an informal poll of fabricators and people who specify
bare board materials.

There's been a lot of literature and presentations lately that
recommend numbers for better material performance under the higher soldering
temperatures.

IPC-4101/126
Tg=170 or higher
Td=340 or higher
maximum expansion 3%
etc.

I'm not questioning the wisdom of the numbers, I'd just like to know whether
everyone (who is doing lead free soldering) is really USING these numbers?
Or this material? Is there no wiggle room anymore? (EVERY example I see now,
lists /126 material)

I've also been advised to use a thicker minimum hole wall thickness than
before. Is that common now? >1mil?

thanks,
Jack

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2