TECHNET Archives

October 2007

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Genny Gibbard <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Genny Gibbard <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:41:17 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (58 lines)
Reasonable suggestion, in many ways.
However, I've spent some time looking into what a QPL is (we don't build
military equipment, so I was unfamiliar with the term).
Unfortunately, after reviewing what is involved in achieving QPL status,
I think if we went only with QPL components, a 10K 0402 chip resistor
would no longer cost only $0.002.  
I think I need to determine an acceptable compromise between QPL
approval process and my own gut feeling on whether a part is a good
cross.  I have to figure out how to document my gut feeling so my
evaluation process is repeatable for others.

Maybe I should have chosen different terminology.  I think I'm opening
this up for a Dewey free-for-all...  :)

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: October 19, 2007 11:45 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Second sources - generic components

Hi
Why not consider adopting the Military QPL's.  Presumably your work
would be largely done.
Monitoring would be your continued responsibility.
Bernie Kessler





At 10:33 AM 10/19/2007:
>Has anyone defined any internal standards for how to approve second
>sources for "generic" components by datasheet review alone, without
>running exhaustive tests on every source?
>I just don't see the point in running 3 weeks of environmental and
>stress tests in order to qualify a $0.002 10Kohm chip resistor second
>source.  I should be able to look at a datasheet and say "yes this is
>OK".  But when you make OEM products you need to justify why you are
>approving it with this method, and I would like to write up some sort
of
>standard to cover off the bases.
>
>I'm looking for places to start.  Thoughts?
>
>Thanks as always, and regards,
>Genny.
>

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2