LEADFREE Archives

September 2007

Leadfree@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Scott Xe <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
(Leadfree Electronics Assembly Forum)
Date:
Sat, 15 Sep 2007 18:05:24 +0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
For packaging materials, they must be compliant to Packaging Directive
94/62/EC, not RoHS Directive for a simple reason that RoHS Directive
excludes packaging materials.  Both directives co-exist for looking after
different areas.  Once RoHS Directive becomes in force, lots of packaging
material were tested to RoHS Directive.  Can the test report be considered
acceptable if the sum of all 4 required hazardous substances is less or
equal to 100 ppm although they are tested to RoHS Directive.  If not, what
are the major concerns to be addressed?

Thanks and regards,

Scott 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree
To temporarily stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks send: SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2