TECHNET Archives

August 2007

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 7 Aug 2007 19:51:53 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (78 lines)
Remember that the industry has been soldering to ~ pure tin for years
with Sn/Pb solder, prior to ROHS. 

As for the intermetallics, when you solder with SnPb you may get
quantitatively less CuSn intermetallics because of the lower quantity of
tin and typically lower soldering temperatures.  I think you could say
that with 63/37 you would theoretically get less erosion of the metallic
surfaces. 

Data to support the soldering to Matte Tin with 63/37?  I suspect that
SolderTec may have that sort of information. Sorry but I don't. I'm sure
they've done some type of study, although it may got back to the
international Tin Research days.

Rich K / GTS

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of - bogert
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 6:44 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Soldering pure matte tin plated component leads using
Sn63Pb37 solder

August 7, 2007

Many component manufacturers because of RoHS regulations have changed
their 
component lead finish to a pure matte tin finish.  Most of these folks
have 
also implemented some form of tin whisker mitigation (anneal after
plating, 
use a nickel flash, etc.).

It is my understanding that assembly level soldering of these component 
leads using the traditional Sn63Pb37 solders for wave soldering, or
reflow 
soldering using Sn63 based paste, with traditional RMA or Rosin based
L0/L1 
flux does not need to change the wave or reflow soldering profile 
temperatures since the matte tin plated component leads are considered 
solderable as a "drop-in" replacement for SnPb plated component leads.

Can folks confirm the above conclusion or otherwise provide comments?
Is 
there any technical information on soldering to matte tin plated leads
using 
Sn63 solder alloy at assembly?  Will the same intermetallics form as
when 
soldered to traditional Pb-bearing leads with Sn63 solder and FR4 board 
material?

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2