Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 7 Aug 2007 18:44:07 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
August 7, 2007
Many component manufacturers because of RoHS regulations have changed their
component lead finish to a pure matte tin finish. Most of these folks have
also implemented some form of tin whisker mitigation (anneal after plating,
use a nickel flash, etc.).
It is my understanding that assembly level soldering of these component
leads using the traditional Sn63Pb37 solders for wave soldering, or reflow
soldering using Sn63 based paste, with traditional RMA or Rosin based L0/L1
flux does not need to change the wave or reflow soldering profile
temperatures since the matte tin plated component leads are considered
solderable as a "drop-in" replacement for SnPb plated component leads.
Can folks confirm the above conclusion or otherwise provide comments? Is
there any technical information on soldering to matte tin plated leads using
Sn63 solder alloy at assembly? Will the same intermetallics form as when
soldered to traditional Pb-bearing leads with Sn63 solder and FR4 board
material?
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
|
|
|