TECHNET Archives

August 2007

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Kevin Glidden <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Kevin Glidden <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 28 Aug 2007 08:04:33 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (270 lines)
That's the "joy" of working for a CM!  Even worse is when a customer is
adament that your company MUST adopt THEIR soldering spec as your standard
for your company, after all it's on their drawing!  For some, IPC apparently
just isn't good enough - their company has the only "experts" in the
industry in their employ... 

-----Original Message-----
From: Hogg, Blair K. [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 10:25 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Fw: question regarding IPC standard

If you are the subcontractor, you have to either abide by the requirements
imposed by your customer, or negotiate the requirements before accepting the
contract.

If a CM has many customers, and each can impose different requirements in
addition to / as a replacement to IPC specs, how does the CM keep track of
all the differences?

Blair

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Bev Christian
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 4:22 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Fw: question regarding IPC standard

In the contract or PO put that your company specs take precedence over the
IPC ones.
Bev
RIM

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Roberts, Jon
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 4:19 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Fw: question regarding IPC standard

Comment, if in our case we have a large contract that states in the Quality
Assurance section that states Soldering shall be in accordance with
ANSI/J-Std 001 Class 3. Repair, rework and modification shall be in
accordance with IPC-7711 and 7721 Class 3. Acceptability of solder joint
shall be per IPC-A-610 Class 3 and ANSI/J-Std-001 Class 3. In the event of a
conflict between IPC-A-610 and ANSI/J-Std 001, the ANSI/J-Std-001 shall
prevail.

 

So how can we vary or not abide? Jon

 

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Roger Stoops
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 8:42 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Fw: question regarding IPC standard

 

IPC 610 is a standard, but some companies may have variences from that

standard, that is their choice.  Nothing in the 610 states that a mfgr

must abideth by said standard or shall suffereth the dire penalties if

they leave the straight and narrow path.  There may be some mfg'g

concerns that are not directly addressed by 610 that need to be clearly

stated in an assembly document or standard, such as the addition of

certain special hardware or adhesives (7.3.2 good section, but isn't

clear enough for our end products).

 

But an order of precedence should be clearly stated and signed off by

all concerned parties.  Somebody has to make the call.

 

My personal preference, FWIW, is:

1) <company name> Manufacturing Standards

2) CM Manufacturing Standards

3) IPC standards

4) Component manufacturer guideline(s)

5) Other applicable industry standards

 

May also want to refer to A-610, section 1.4.2, "Acceptance Criteria."

Please note A-610 is number 3 in a list of 4 items. 

 

BRgds,

Roger

 

-----Original Message-----

From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Bob Arciolla

Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 10:08 AM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: [TN] Fw: question regarding IPC standard

 

Hi all,

A question came up here yesterday regarding what has precedence in

regard to quality issues. Some say IPC 610 would over company criteria

and some visa versa. The question came up noting that it is a standard

and cannot be changed. Others said it is that companies can vary from

the standard if they choose. Help.. who is right here??

 

Thanks, Bob

 

---------------------------------------------------

Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To

unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in

the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or

(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET

Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the

posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the

archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please

visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for

additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or

847-615-7100 ext.2815

-----------------------------------------------------

 

---------------------------------------------------

Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0

To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in

the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet

To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)

To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest

Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives

Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information,
or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815

-----------------------------------------------------


---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the
BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per
day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information,
or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------
This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential
information, privileged material (including material protected by the
solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public
information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended
recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error,
please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your
system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this
transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the
BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet
NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the
posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the
archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please visit
IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

*******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the
presence of computer viruses.

www.Hubbell.com - Hubbell Incorporated

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the
BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet
NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send
e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the archives of
previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please visit IPC web
site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2